Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-42681
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

EU finds Meta and TikTok failed to protect children from harmful content

The European Commission has made preliminary findings that Meta and TikTok violated child protection rules under the Digital Services Act by restricting researcher access to data and making it difficult to report child sexual abuse material, exposing both companies to potential fines of up to 6% of global turnover.

27 October 2025 · Meta · Governance, accountability and labour
27 October 2025
AII-1001-42681View source ↗
Quick facts
Category
Governance, accountability and labour
Source
9to5Mac
Date
27 October 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

The European Commission made preliminary findings that Meta and TikTok violated child protection rules under the Digital Services Act by placing burdensome procedures and tools that restricted researchers' access to public data on whether children are exposed to illegal or harmful content.

Meta was additionally found to have made it difficult for users to report illegal content such as child sexual abuse material by neither Facebook nor Instagram providing a user-friendly and easily accessible 'Notice and Action' mechanism, and by using dark patterns or deceptive interface designs to deliberately make filing such reports both complex and confusing.

Reported impact

The restrictions on researcher access often left them with partial or unreliable data, impacting their ability to conduct research on whether users, including minors, are exposed to illegal or harmful content.

Governance controls

Both companies were given an opportunity to examine the Commission's report and file responses, with potential fines of up to 6% of their total worldwide annual turnover if responses are deemed unacceptable.

Classification

Category
Governance, accountability and labour
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Public interest, Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Children, General public
Failure modes
Content moderation failure, Manipulation or dark pattern
Consequences
Regulatory investigation, Fine or settlement
Regulations
EU AI Act (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

9to5Mac
Meta and TikTok failed to protect children, says EU
27 October 2025
Sep 2026Amazon Blocks Meta's Muse AI Shopping Agent Over Policy ViolationsConfirmedGovernance, accountability and labourPunto InformaticoJawaPos.comSep 2026UK government rejects emergency AI shutdown mechanismConfirmedGovernance, accountability and labourBBCThe IndependentAnadolu Ajansı+1Sep 2026Google implements search changes in Europe following DMA enforcementConfirmedGovernance, accountability and labourdete | Eιδήσεις | Πάτρα | Δυτική ΕλλάδαTechblog.grSep 2026AI Chatbots Circumvent EU Sanctions on Russian State MediaReportedGovernance, accountability and labourder StandardKronen ZeitungJul 2026Meta Oversight Board study: AI chatbots refuse political criticism more in authoritarian statesConfirmedGovernance, accountability and labourYahoo! FinanceEuronews EnglishFast Company