Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-24159
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Western Australia Police Deploy Real-Time Facial Recognition Cameras

Western Australia Police began a real-time facial recognition camera trial on 19 June 2026, the first of its kind in Australia. The Overt Live Facial Recognition system scans crowds in designated public spaces and alerts officers to matches against a database of wanted suspects, missing people, and offenders. Police say human operators make final assessments, but critics describe the deployment as an overreach introduced without public consultation.

19 June 2026 Β· WA Police Β· Privacy and surveillance
19 June 2026
AII-1000-24159
Quick facts
Category
Privacy and surveillance
Country
Australia
Date
19 June 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Western Australia Police deployed Overt Live Facial Recognition technology in an Australia-first trial beginning 19 June 2026, mounting cameras on or near marked police vans in designated public spaces.

The system scans crowds to detect faces and compares them against a database of alert list targets including over 4,000 people with outstanding warrants, approximately 4,000 people on child sex offender lists who have completed sentences, serious offence suspects, and missing people.

When a match reaches a predetermined confidence threshold, an operator is alerted and retains the image. Police Commissioner Col Blanch stated trained officers make the final assessment before taking action.

Reported impact

Police said the technology will reduce response times compared to manual facial recognition, which previously took hours to confirm identification.

Critics characterised the deployment as a 'massive overreach' introduced without public consultation.

Index analysis

The alert list database contains only 'lawfully held police images' according to police, though critics raised concerns about surveillance scope.

The technology has a record of over 2,000 arrests in the UK where it has been used.

Governance controls

Police stated human operators assess matches rather than automatically arresting based on detections.

The alert list is described as 'strictly controlled' and uploaded before camera deployment.

Classification

Category
Privacy and surveillance
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
Australia
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Unknown
Harmed
General public
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
Overt Live Facial Recognition

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident