Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-97997
Well documentedThree or more independent publishers report the core facts.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Photographer's work misattributed as AI-generated by Elon Musk's Grok

Elon Musk retweeted photographs by Australian photographer Charles Brooks with a caption crediting Grok for creating them, when the AI system had only added minor elements to Brooks's original work. Brooks complained publicly, and X suspended his account before reinstating it six hours later.

31 May 2025 Β· Elon Musk Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
31 May 2025
AII-1001-97997
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
Australia
Date
31 May 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Australian photographer Charles Brooks created photos of the insides of instruments. Another X user added small human figures to three of these photos using Grok in late May 2025, crediting Brooks in a comment.

On May 31, Elon Musk retweeted the post with the caption 'Generate images with @Grok' and a tag for the AI program, without mentioning Brooks. Musk's retweet to 220 million followers suggested the AI made the photos entirely.

Reported impact

Brooks stated that his photographs were presented as AI-generated work, which misrepresented the nature and origin of his art. He called the crediting approach 'disingenuous' because his name was only mentioned in a follow-up comment rather than the main post.

X suspended Brooks's account after he complained on Reddit on June 4, 2025. He was reinstated six hours later.

Index analysis

Grok was used to add elements to existing photographs but did not generate the base images. The failure to credit the original photographer in the main post created a misattribution of work to the AI system.

Governance controls

X suspended Brooks's account after he publicly criticized the misattribution, then reinstated it after six hours.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Australia
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Reputational
Failure modes
Misidentification
Consequences
System suspension or termination
AI systems
Grok

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident