Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-51449
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.

Shilpa Shetty alleges AI-enabled impersonation and misuse of likeness

Actor Shilpa Shetty Kundra filed a suit in Bombay High Court against 28 defendants, including e-commerce platforms and tech giants, alleging unauthorized use of her name, image, voice and likeness through AI tools to create deepfakes and sell products falsely implied to be endorsed by her. She seeks injunctions, content takedowns and damages of β‚Ή5 lakh.

27 November 2025 Β· Amazon Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
27 November 2025
AII-1001-51449View source β†—
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
India
Source
thehindu.com
Date
27 November 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Shilpa Shetty Kundra filed a suit in Bombay High Court in November 2025 against 28 defendants, including e-commerce platforms Amazon and Flipkart, social media companies Meta, Google and X Corp, and unnamed AI platforms, alleging rampant misuse of her identity through artificial intelligence tools.

The petition alleges that AI-driven tools have created deepfake videos and voice clones portraying her in obscene, indecent and defamatory contexts. Other violations cited include unauthorized sale of merchandise falsely implying her endorsement, such as "Shilpa Shetty Yellow Saree" and "Fear Less -- Shilpa Shetty Celebrity T-shirt," manipulated visuals circulating on Reddit and other platforms, and an event titled "Shilpa Shetty Award Show -- Client Promotion Packages" advertised without consent.

Reported impact

Shetty argues that inferior quality goods and defamatory content debase her persona and mislead the public. She claims violations have continued daily across platforms since discovering the misuse in November 2025.

Index analysis

The petition alleges infringement of her personality rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution, moral rights under Sections 38, 38A and 38B of the Copyright Act, and passing off under common law.

Governance controls

Shetty sought the appointment of a court receiver to seize infringing merchandise and electronic data, and directions to government agencies to enforce removal of unlawful content. She also requested dynamic injunctions to block future infringing content and mirror websites, and John Doe orders to restrain unidentified wrongdoers.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
India
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Reputational, Economic or property
Failure modes
Deepfake video, Voice clone, Misidentification
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
AI-driven deepfake tools, AI voice cloning tools

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

thehindu.com
Shilpa Shetty alleges AI-enabled impersonation and misuse of likeness