Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-45733
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Meta's AI Fails to Block Deepfake Scam Ads Targeting Polish Businessman

Meta's content moderation systems on Facebook and Instagram failed to block deepfake scam advertisements that used the likeness of Polish InPost president Rafał Brzoska and his wife to defraud users. Despite court orders and decisions by Poland's data protection authority requiring removal, the fraudulent ads continued circulating and even reached Brzoska's children, prompting his public criticism and the Polish government's intervention.

19 August 2026 · Meta · Fraud, scams and manipulation
19 August 2026
AII-1000-457333 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Country
Poland
Source
netTG.pl
Date
19 August 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Rafał Brzoska, president of InPost, reported that Meta's Facebook and Instagram platforms displayed illegal deepfake advertisements and scam content that unlawfully used his and his wife's likenesses to defraud users.

Despite court orders and decisions by the Polish Data Protection Office (UODO) mandating removal of this content, the false advertisements continued to be published and reached Brzoska's children. Meta's algorithms and human moderators failed to detect the fraudulent content after initial reports.

Reported impact

The scam ads targeting Brzoska's identity were used to extort money from the public. The content reached Brzoska's own children despite legal orders for its removal.

In response to Brzoska's public criticism of Meta and disclosure of Polish managers' names, Meta temporarily suspended his account while denying responsibility for the problem. The Polish government subsequently demanded explanations from Meta.

Index analysis

According to Panoptykon Foundation expert Katarzyna Szymielewicz, Meta's responsibility under Polish and European law is limited—it only applies once the platform is notified of illegal content. Meta can argue its algorithms did not detect the deepfakes and moderators lacked sufficient context to identify the scam.

Under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), Meta should design its algorithms and interfaces to prevent the spread of disinformation, scams, and illegal content. Szymielewicz assessed that Meta does not do this effectively, as demonstrated by the Brzoska case.

Governance controls

Meta's content moderation relies on algorithmic detection and human review. The case reveals that Meta's systems failed to automatically identify and remove deepfake advertisements even after court orders and UODO decisions required their removal.

Classification

Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Poland
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Reputational, Economic or property
Harmed
Consumers, Business
Failure modes
Deepfake image, Content moderation failure
Consequences
System suspension or termination
AI systems
Meta Content Moderation System
Regulations
EU AI Act (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

netTG.pl
Sprawa Brzoski pokazuje jak Meta nieskutecznie zapobiega...
19 August 2026
Polska Agencja Prasowa
Panoptykon: sprawa Brzoski pokazuje jak Meta nieskutecznie zapobiega dezinformacji i scamowi
19 August 2026
Rzeczpospolita
Brzoska chce walczyć z Big Techami. Ekspertka: potrzebne są mocniejsze narzędzia
19 August 2026