Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-35641
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Influencer admits using AI to create art sold as original illustrations

Influencer Karen Bachini sold illustrations as her own original artwork through a paid monthly subscription service, but admitted under public pressure that she used AI to create them. She later apologized, stating the misrepresentation was wrong.

23 July 2026 Β· Karen Bachini Β· Fraud, scams and manipulation
23 July 2026
AII-1000-35641
Quick facts
Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Country
Brazil
Date
23 July 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Karen Bachini launched a monthly stationery subscription service called Mail Club in June 2026 at R$ 149 per month, promising customers scrapbooking items and personalized illustrations that she presented as her own creations. She stated 'I love art, I live art. I am an artist since I remember myself' in the product launch announcement.

After initial subscribers shared videos of received content online, artists and other content creators began questioning the authenticity of the illustrations, noting stylistic inconsistencies and characteristics common to AI-generated images. Bachini then withdrew from social media for a period.

On July 23, 2026, Bachini published a video admitting she had used artificial intelligence to finalize the drawings sold to subscribers, stating 'I did wrong. When I do wrong, I own up to it. I used AI, yes, to finalize my drawings. It wasn't good. It wasn't pretty. It was very ugly. This has no excuse. I apologize to everyone.'

Reported impact

Subscribers who paid for the Mail Club service received illustrations that were misrepresented as original artwork created by the influencer, undermining their trust in the service and the products delivered.

Index analysis

The incident reflects a deliberate misrepresentation of AI-assisted content as original human artwork in a commercial context, facilitated by the influencer's public claims of artistic authorship and '100% dependence' on her own work.

Classification

Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Industry
Arts, entertainment and recreation
Country
Brazil
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational
Harmed
Consumers
Failure modes
Manipulation or dark pattern
Consequences
Public apology
AI systems
Unspecified AI tool

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident