Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-97607
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.Supporting sources are pending verification.

DeepSeek accused of training on Google Gemini data

Researchers have reportedly found evidence that DeepSeek's R1 model was trained using data from Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro, based on similarities in language patterns and reasoning traces. DeepSeek and Google have not publicly responded to the allegations.

3 June 2025 Β· DeepSeek Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
3 June 2025
AII-1001-97607
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
China
Date
3 June 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Researchers Sam Paech and an anonymous creator of SpeechMap found that DeepSeek's R1-0528 model employed words, expressions, and reasoning patterns similar to those of Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro, raising suspicions that DeepSeek used Gemini data for training.

DeepSeek did not reveal the specific sources of data used to train its R1 model. Google and DeepSeek have not publicly responded to the allegations.

Reported impact

The suspected misuse raises ethical and legal concerns regarding data use in artificial intelligence and intellectual property practices. This follows previous accusations that DeepSeek employed distillation techniques using OpenAI data, which may violate service terms when data is used outside authorized platforms.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Digital security
Country
China
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Reputational
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Training data misuse
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
DeepSeek R1, Google Gemini 2.5 Pro

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident