Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-99947
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.

BBC Threatens Legal Action Against Perplexity for Copyright Infringement

The BBC threatened legal action against Perplexity, alleging the AI startup used its content without permission to train its default model and reproduces significant portions of articles, harming the broadcaster's traffic and reputation. Perplexity rejected the claims as manipulative and denied any copyright violation.

20 June 2025 · Perplexity · Intellectual property and appropriation
20 June 2025
AII-1001-999473 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United Kingdom
Source
in.gr
Date
20 June 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

The BBC sent a letter to Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity, accusing the AI company of using BBC content without licence to train its default AI model. The letter, disclosed by the Financial Times, demands that Perplexity stop using BBC content, delete all copies used for training, and submit a financial compensation proposal for the alleged misuse of copyright.

The BBC claims that Perplexity reproduces significant portions of its content verbatim, reducing users' need to visit BBC's website directly. The broadcaster also asserts that 17% of Perplexity's answers based on BBC content contain significant errors or lack context, potentially damaging the organisation's reputation and credibility.

Perplexity rejected the allegations, characterizing them as 'manipulative and opportunistic' and arguing that BBC has a 'fundamental misunderstanding of technology, the internet and copyright law.' Perplexity claims BBC is attempting to protect Google's unlawful monopoly.

Reported impact

The BBC reports that Perplexity's reproduction of its content reduces user traffic to its website, as the AI system provides answers directly without directing users to BBC sources.

According to BBC, 17% of Perplexity answers based on BBC content contain significant errors or missing context, which may harm the broadcaster's reputation and credibility.

Index analysis

This dispute reflects broader tension between publishers and AI companies over training data use. In October, Dow Jones submitted a lawsuit accusing Perplexity of 'massive scraping' of content, and the New York Times sent a cease-and-desist letter demanding Perplexity stop scraping its content.

Publishers including Financial Times, Axel Springer, Hearst and News Corporation have signed content licensing agreements with OpenAI. Reuters has signed an agreement with Meta, and the Daily Mail's parent company has signed an agreement with ProRata.ai.

Governance controls

In October, the BBC registered copyrights for its news website content in the US, entitling it to 'statutory damages in connection with unauthorised use' of these copyright-protected works.

The BBC's legal action comes weeks after BBC and Sky management criticized a UK government proposal that would permit AI companies to use copyright-protected works without explicit permission.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
United Kingdom
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Training data misuse
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Perplexity default AI model
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

in.gr
Perplexity AI: Το BBC απειλεί με νομικά μέτρα εταιρεία ΑΙ που χτενίζει το περιεχόμενό του | in.gr
20 June 2025
LiFO
AI: Το BBC απειλεί με μήνυση την εταιρεία Perplexity για χρήση περιεχομένου χωρίς άδεια | LiFO
21 June 2025
MediaNama
Perplexity Faces Lawsuit from BBC for Copyright Infringement
24 June 2025