Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-80133
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.

Perplexity sued by Japanese newspapers for unauthorized article use

Nikkei Inc. and Asahi Shimbun Company sued Perplexity AI on May 14, 2026, alleging the AI search service copied their news articles without authorization and incorporated them into generated summaries since June 2024. The newspapers claimed copyright and unfair competition violations, seeking article use cessation and combined damages of 2.2 billion yen; Perplexity disputed the claims.

14 May 2026 · Perplexity · Intellectual property and appropriation
14 May 2026
AII-1000-801332 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
Japan
Source
日本経済新聞
Date
14 May 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Nikkei Inc. and Asahi Shimbun Company filed a lawsuit against US AI company Perplexity on May 14, 2026, at Tokyo District Court, alleging unauthorized use of their news articles. The newspapers claimed Perplexity accessed their servers and copied article content without permission, including paywall-protected articles, starting from June 2024 onwards.

The newspapers argued that Perplexity violated Japan's Copyright Law by reproducing and publicly transmitting their articles through its AI search service without authorization, and violated their terms of service which prohibit storing or copying data for AI training. They also cited violations of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, alleging that Perplexity displayed the newspapers as source references while providing inaccurate summaries that damaged their reputation.

Reported impact

The newspapers sought an immediate halt to article use and deletion of summarized content. Nikkei and Asahi each demanded a combined 2.2 billion yen in damages, comprising 1 billion yen for usage fees and an additional 1.2 billion yen for loss of business profit resulting from the provision of inaccurate generated content.

The Japanese Newspaper Association stated in April 2026 that generative AI search services threaten the business foundation of news organizations providing accurate and trustworthy information, demanding response from businesses and government.

Index analysis

Perplexity stated it operates appropriately under Japan's frameworks for search, information analysis, technical processing and citation, and disputed the newspapers' characterization of its actions, contesting jurisdiction and the specificity of claims. The company declined to provide detailed arguments at the initial hearing, indicating it would submit details later.

Governance controls

The lawsuit highlights the absence of established legal precedent and regulatory guidance for AI search services' use of news content in Japan. The dispute occurs amid similar litigation by Yomiuri Shimbun, and protests from Asahi, Nikkei, Yomiuri, Sankei, Mainichi, and Kyodo News regarding unauthorized article use by Perplexity.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Japan
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Unauthorised scraping
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Perplexity AI search service
Regulations
FCRA (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

日本経済新聞
日経・朝日「AI検索で著作権侵害」、米新興側は争う姿勢 地裁で初弁論
14 May 2026
ITmedia
AI事業者が争う姿勢 朝日、日経の記事無断使用巡り
15 May 2026