AI-generated fake bank cheque shared on social media sparks fraud concerns
A user shared a hyper-realistic AI-generated image of a UCO Bank cheque for βΉ69,000 created with ChatGPT Images 2.0 on X (Twitter) in April 2026, sparking public debate about potential financial fraud risks and AI safety guardrails. The image included detailed banking elements such as account numbers, branch details, signatures, and MICR bands, demonstrating the capabilities of OpenAI's image generation tool while raising concerns about bypassing content safety restrictions.
What happened
A user named Shirish shared on X (formerly Twitter) on April 22, 2026, a detailed image of a UCO Bank cheque for βΉ69,000 made out in his own name, claiming it was generated using ChatGPT Images 2.0.
The AI-generated image included complex banking elements such as branch address, signature line, account number, and MICR band at the bottom. Shirish noted that he used "certain tricks" to bypass AI safety protocols that restrict generating fraudulent documents.
Reported impact
The post went viral on social media, sparking widespread debate about potential for financial fraud and the rapid advancement of AI image synthesis capabilities.
Reactions were mixed: some users praised the technical capabilities while others expressed concern that such tools could make it difficult for average people to trust visual evidence and distinguish genuine documents from AI-generated fakes.
Index analysis
The incident highlights gaps in content safety guardrails of AI image generation models, as the tool generated detailed fraudulent financial documents despite stated restrictions against creating such content.
Some experts noted that current banking systems have additional technical safeguards, such as CTS compliance requirements and UV-reactive inks, that would prevent such AI-generated images from being accepted by financial institutions.
Classification
Sources and evidence
Sources not yet published
This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.