Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-72501
Well documentedThree or more independent publishers report the core facts.Supporting sources are pending verification.

AI-generated fake bank cheque shared on social media sparks fraud concerns

A user shared a hyper-realistic AI-generated image of a UCO Bank cheque for β‚Ή69,000 created with ChatGPT Images 2.0 on X (Twitter) in April 2026, sparking public debate about potential financial fraud risks and AI safety guardrails. The image included detailed banking elements such as account numbers, branch details, signatures, and MICR bands, demonstrating the capabilities of OpenAI's image generation tool while raising concerns about bypassing content safety restrictions.

22 April 2026 Β· OpenAI Β· Fraud, scams and manipulation
22 April 2026
AII-1000-72501
Quick facts
Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Country
India
Date
22 April 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A user named Shirish shared on X (formerly Twitter) on April 22, 2026, a detailed image of a UCO Bank cheque for β‚Ή69,000 made out in his own name, claiming it was generated using ChatGPT Images 2.0.

The AI-generated image included complex banking elements such as branch address, signature line, account number, and MICR band at the bottom. Shirish noted that he used "certain tricks" to bypass AI safety protocols that restrict generating fraudulent documents.

Reported impact

The post went viral on social media, sparking widespread debate about potential for financial fraud and the rapid advancement of AI image synthesis capabilities.

Reactions were mixed: some users praised the technical capabilities while others expressed concern that such tools could make it difficult for average people to trust visual evidence and distinguish genuine documents from AI-generated fakes.

Index analysis

The incident highlights gaps in content safety guardrails of AI image generation models, as the tool generated detailed fraudulent financial documents despite stated restrictions against creating such content.

Some experts noted that current banking systems have additional technical safeguards, such as CTS compliance requirements and UV-reactive inks, that would prevent such AI-generated images from being accepted by financial institutions.

Classification

Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Industry
Financial and insurance services
Country
India
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Public interest
Harmed
Business, General public
Failure modes
Deepfake image, Jailbreak
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
ChatGPT Images 2.0

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident