Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-65181
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.

AI Detection Tools Produce False Positives, Enable Extortion

Three AI detection tools tested by journalists produced false positive results classifying human-written content as AI-generated, then solicited payment for correction services. Researchers warn the tools can be exploited to damage reputation and contribute misinformation, particularly targeting students and academics.

30 March 2026 · JustDone AI · Fraud, scams and manipulation
30 March 2026
AII-1000-651812 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Country
United States
Source
France 24
Date
30 March 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Journalists from Agence France-Presse tested three AI detection tools—JustDone AI, TextGuard, and Refinely—claiming to identify AI-generated content. Testing across four languages (Dutch, Greek, Hungarian, and English), the tools classified all human-written texts as AI-generated, including 1916 Hungarian literary classics.

JustDone AI analyzed a human-written article about war in the Middle East and incorrectly concluded it was '80%' or '88%' AI-generated, then offered to 'humanize' the text for a fee up to $9.99. TextGuard and Refinely produced similarly false positive results with attached paywalled services. Some tools operated without internet access, suggesting pre-written results rather than genuine analysis.

Reported impact

Researchers warn the tools can be deliberately misused to damage credibility and reputations. In Hungary, government-aligned influencers screenshotted JustDone AI results to falsely claim opposition campaign documents were entirely AI-generated.

The tools target students and researchers seeking to conceal AI use. Companies claim users include prestigious universities such as Cornell, though Cornell denied any association to Agence France-Presse. Academics describe the tools as contributing an additional layer of misinformation to an already fragmented information environment.

Index analysis

TextGuard stated its results are 'reliable within the limits of the technology' but cannot guarantee accuracy or compare to other systems. JustDone acknowledged that 'no AI detector can guarantee 100% accuracy' and admitted its free version may produce less accurate results due to high demand and use of a 'lighter model for speed of access.'

A user complaint cited that JustDone classifies entirely human-written texts as AI-generated. Researcher Deborah Fiber-Wolf, based in Germany, stated these are 'not detection tools but fraud under the guise of humanization,' offering absurd alternatives.

Classification

Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational, Public interest
Harmed
Consumers, General public
Failure modes
Hallucination, Misidentification, Manipulation or dark pattern
AI systems
JustDone AI detection tool, TextGuard detection tool, Refinely detection tool

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

France 24
بين الحقيقة والابتزاز: معضلة أدوات الكشف عن محتويات الذكاء الاصطناعي
30 March 2026
العربي الجديد
أدوات كشف الذكاء الاصطناعي تتحوّل إلى "أداة احتيال"
30 March 2026