Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-89927
Well documentedThree or more independent publishers report the core facts.

Actors' Likenesses Misused in Deepfake Scams After Licensing to AI Platforms

Actors who licensed their likenesses to AI avatar platforms discovered their digital doubles being misused in deepfake scams promoting dubious health products and political content. Despite earning modest fees, many found their contracts contained exploitative terms that prevented them from controlling or removing the videos.

16 April 2025 · Synthesia · Fraud, scams and manipulation
16 April 2025
AII-1001-899275 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Country
South Korea
Source
Ars Technica
Date
16 April 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

South Korean actor Simon Lee discovered his likeness being used in deepfake videos on TikTok and Instagram promoting questionable health cures, appearing as a gynaecologist or surgeon endorsing lemon balm tea for weight loss and ice baths for acne. He is one of scores of people who licensed their image to AI marketing companies and subsequently found their digital avatars featured in misleading advertisements or political propaganda.

Lee told AFP that his contract terms prevented him from removing the videos. AI platforms allow customers to select a licensed face, choose a language and tone, insert a script, and generate videos at minimal cost—free for basic versions or a few hundred euros for pro versions—to create realistic deepfakes superior in expressiveness to purely AI-generated avatars.

Reported impact

Lee stated that he would not have objected if the advertisements had been legitimate. Actors who licensed their likenesses for modest fees—typically up to a few thousand euros depending on duration and fame—found themselves bound by contracts containing complex legal language and sometimes abusive clauses that they did not fully understand when signing.

Index analysis

The technology provides a cheaper alternative to filming real actors while producing more realistic results than fully AI-generated avatars. Legal experts warned that technology is outpacing regulation, creating risk of exploitation.

Governance controls

Contracts between actors and AI marketing platforms often contain abusive clauses and legal jargon that people signed without fully understanding the terms, leaving them unable to control how their likeness is used.

Classification

Category
Fraud, scams and manipulation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
South Korea
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational, Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Consumers, Workers
Failure modes
Deepfake video, Manipulation or dark pattern
AI systems
Synthesia

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Ars Technica
Regrets: Actors who sold AI avatars stuck in Black Mirror-esque dystopia
18 April 2025
The Economic Times
They sold their likeness to AI platforms and regretted it
16 April 2025
mint
They sold their likeness to AI -- and regretted it
16 April 2025
The Star
They sold their likeness to AI platforms - and regretted it
16 April 2025
Forbes India
Crushing Regret Of Selling Likeness To AI Platforms - Forbes India
17 April 2025