Skip to content
Submit incident
InactiveWithdrawn, repealed, lapsed or replaced.

Directive on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence

European Union Β· Regulation Β· European Commission

Our summary

A proposed directive to adapt civil liability rules so that victims harmed by artificial intelligence systems can obtain compensation more easily. It addresses challenges that existing fault-based liability rules pose for AI-related damages by harmonising rules across the EU to reduce legal uncertainty and fragmentation. The proposal aims to promote trust in AI and its uptake by ensuring victims receive protection equivalent to those harmed by other products.

Written by the Index in our own words. It is not legal advice; the official text is the authority.

Inside this policy

Every section of this policy in order. Our notes summarise each one in plain language and do not quote the official text, which is the authority.

Drafted by the Index An automated summary of the official text, not yet reviewed by a person.Reviewed Checked by a person against the official text.

9 sections

  1. Article 1 Subject matter and scope

    Establishes common rules on disclosure of evidence for high-risk AI systems in fault-based damage claims and on burden of proof in such claims brought to national courts. Applies to non-contractual fault-based damage claims arising from AI systems after the transposition deadline, but excludes criminal liability and transport, product liability, digital services and certain national proof rules.

    Drafted by the Index
  2. Article 2 Definitions

    Defines AI system, high-risk AI system, provider, and user by reference to the AI Act. Defines claim for damages as seeking compensation for AI output or failure to produce required output, and claimant as an injured person, successor, or representative bringing such a claim. Also defines potential claimant, defendant, and duty of care.

    Drafted by the Index
  3. Article 3 Disclosure of evidence and rebuttable presumption of non-compliance

    Empowers national courts to order providers, obligated persons, or users to disclose evidence of high-risk AI system malfunction after the claimant has made proportionate attempts to gather it from the defendant. Courts must limit disclosure to what is necessary and proportionate, may restrict confidential information, and must presume fault if the defendant fails to comply with disclosure orders.

    Drafted by the Index
  4. Article 4 Rebuttable presumption of a causal link in the case of fault

    National courts shall presume causal link between fault and AI output or failure where the claimant demonstrates fault, it is reasonably likely the fault influenced the output, and the output caused damage. For high-risk AI systems, fault of the provider is presumed when they failed to meet requirements on training data quality, transparency, human oversight, accuracy or cybersecurity, or failed to take corrective action, and fault of users is presumed where they failed to comply with use, monitoring, suspension instructions or exposed the system to irrelevant input data. The presumption does not apply if the defendant shows sufficient evidence and expertise are reasonably accessible to the claimant, does not apply to non-high-risk systems unless proving causal link is excessively difficult, and does not apply to personal non-professional users unless they materially interfered with operation.

    Drafted by the Index
  5. Article 5 Evaluation and targeted review

  6. Article 6 Amendment to Directive (EU) 2020/1828

    Adds this AI Liability Directive to Annex I of Directive (EU) 2020/1828.

    Drafted by the Index
  7. Article 7 Transposition

    Member States must enact implementing laws within two years of entry into force and communicate them to the Commission, referencing this Directive or making such reference at official publication.

    Drafted by the Index
  8. Article 8 Entry into force

  9. Article 9 Addressees

    This Directive is directed to the Member States. The text includes signatures from the European Parliament and Council.

    Drafted by the Index

Change history

  1. Official text wording
    Source for this change (opens in a new tab)
  2. Official text wording
    Source for this change (opens in a new tab)