Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-45699
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.

xAI Compelled Employees to Surrender Biometric Data for Ani Chatbot

xAI reportedly required employees to sign away rights to their faces and voices to train AI chatbots including Ani, a sexually suggestive female avatar, as part of a confidential project. Employees expressed concerns about their likenesses being used without consent in deepfakes or sold to other companies, but were told participation was mandatory.

April 2025 ยท xAI ยท Intellectual property and appropriation
April 2025
AII-1001-456992 sources โ†“
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United States
Source
The Verge
Date
April 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

At an April meeting, xAI lawyer Lily Lim told employees that recording audio and video sessions was 'a job requirement' to train AI companions. Employees were required to sign release forms granting xAI 'a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, sub-licensable, royalty-free license' to use, reproduce, and distribute their faces and voices as part of confidential 'Project Skippy.'

During the meeting, employees asked whether they could opt out or if xAI could sell their likenesses to others. The project leader did not offer an option to decline, instead directing concerned workers to reach out to listed points of contact.

Reported impact

Some employees whose likenesses were used to train the avatars told The Wall Street Journal they were disturbed by how sexualized Ani's responses became. Others worried their faces could be repurposed in deepfake videos or used without consent in other products.

Index analysis

The chatbot Ani, released on X's $30-a-month SuperGrok service, was described as having sexually suggestive features including an anime avatar with blond pigtails and an NSFW setting.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Consumer services
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Workers
Failure modes
Training data misuse
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
Ani, Grok

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

The Verge
xAI used employee biometric data to train Elon Musk's AI girlfriend
5 November 2025
New York Post
'Tutors' at Musk startup xAI had to give up rights to faces, voices...
5 November 2025
Mar 2026Chicken Soup for the Soul sues Apple, Google, Meta and others over AI trainingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationReuters9to5MacMacDailyNewsAug 2025Eliza Labs sues X for alleged AI IP theft and anticompetitive deplatformingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationReutersRTE.ieCryptoSlateAug 2025xAI sues former engineer for alleged theft of Grok trade secretsAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationVOI - Waktunya Merevolusi PemberitaanุตุญูŠูุฉ ุงู„ู…ูˆุงุทู† ุงู„ุฅู„ูƒุชุฑูˆู†ูŠุฉูˆูƒุงู„ู‡ ุนู…ูˆู† ุงู„ุงุฎุจุงุฑูŠู‡+6Dec 2024Authors including Carreyrou sue OpenAI, Google, Meta and others for unauthorized book trainingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationSpiegel OnlineEconomic TimesAug 2024Nintendo partner uses AI tool to remove AI-generated Mario images from XWell documentedIntellectual property and appropriationMobileSyrupIGN Southeast AsiaTechRadar