Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-43557
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Worker Fined After Lawyer Used AI to Create Fake Legal Citation in Brazilian Court

A worker was fined R$ 1,200 by a Brazilian labor court after his lawyer used AI to generate a false citation to a non-existent court ruling. The court found the worker engaged in bad-faith litigation by presenting AI-generated content designed to challenge a medical examination, rejecting arguments that AI use in legal documents is a legitimate practice.

27 October 2025 · Tribunal Regional do Trabalho de Minas Gerais · Reliability and hallucination
27 October 2025
AII-1001-435572 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
Brazil
Source
ConvergenciaDigital
Date
27 October 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A worker's lawyer used an AI system to create a false citation to a non-existent ruling by the Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST) in a labor case at the Vara do Trabalho de Araçuaí. The fake citation was presented in a motion to contest the results of a medical examination ordered in the case.

Reported impact

The worker was ordered to pay a fine of R$ 1,200 to the opposing party. The fine was to be deducted from any amounts the worker received in the case.

Index analysis

The Nona Turma of the Tribunal Regional do Trabalho de Minas Gerais (TRT-MG) unanimously confirmed the penalty, finding that the worker engaged in bad-faith litigation. The court ruled the issue was not a simple error in the ruling number but the creation of non-existent content designed to benefit the worker and mislead the court.

The worker argued the citation error was a material mistake without intent to deceive and contended that using AI to draft legal documents is a legitimate practice. The court rejected these arguments, stating that use of AI tools does not exempt parties from responsibility for content presented to the judiciary.

Governance controls

The court found the worker violated the duty of procedural good faith under articles 793-B, sections II and V of the Brazilian Labor Code (CLT), constituting bad-faith litigation. The relator stated that judicial proceedings require integrity, a fundamental principle that was clearly violated.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
Brazil
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Public interest, Economic or property
Failure modes
Fabricated citation, Hallucination
Consequences
Fine or settlement, Litigation
AI systems
AI tool used by lawyer

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

ConvergenciaDigital
Texto gerado por inteligência artificial dá litigância de má fé e multa de R$ 1,2 mil - ConvergenciaDigital
27 October 2025
O TEMPO
Trabalhador é multado após advogado usar IA em processo e citar súmula inexistente
27 October 2025