Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-27691
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

UW researchers find same-origin policy bypasses in AI browsers

Researchers at the University of Washington found that four of seven agentic AI browsers can be exploited to bypass same-origin policy protections, allowing attackers to steal user credentials and sensitive information. They demonstrated a successful proof-of-concept attack on ChatGPT Atlas and identified similar vulnerabilities in browsers from Google, Anthropic, and Perplexity AI.

26 April 2026 Β· OpenAI Β· Security and cyberattacks
26 April 2026
AII-1000-276912 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Security and cyberattacks
Country
United States
Source
EurekAlert!
Date
26 April 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A University of Washington team studied seven popular agentic AI browsers and found that four create ways for malicious actors to bypass the same-origin policy, a fundamental cybersecurity protocol that prevents websites open in a browser from interacting with each other's information.

Researchers ran a successful proof-of-concept cyberattack on ChatGPT Atlas in which a website stole information from another website embedded in it. They also identified conditions for similar attacks in Chrome with Gemini, Claude for Chrome, and Perplexity Comet.

Reported impact

Users of agentic AI browsers with broad agent permissions cannot trust that their sensitive information is protected, according to David Kohlbrenner, a UW assistant professor. Researchers warned that if agents have access to a browser containing user credentials such as email or bank account information, the systems are not yet ready to truly protect that information.

Index analysis

The same-origin policy, introduced in 1995, is a fundamental security measure that keeps different websites from interacting with each other even if one is embedded in another. This policy evolved over 30 years to allow users to safely visit most websites without careful vetting.

Governance controls

Browsers that gave agents fewer permissions were generally safer, according to the UW research.

Classification

Category
Security and cyberattacks
Industry
Digital security
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property
Harmed
Consumers
Failure modes
Unsafe autonomous behaviour, Data leak
AI systems
ChatGPT Atlas, Chrome with Gemini, Claude for Chrome, Perplexity Comet

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

EurekAlert!
Some agentic AI browsers come with major cybersecurity risks, UW study finds
30 June 2026
Mirage News
Agentic AI Browsers Pose Cybersecurity Risks: UW Study
30 June 2026