Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-04617
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Tribunal Partially Reverses Privacy Finding on Bunnings Facial Recognition

Australia's Administrative Review Tribunal partially overturned a 2024 privacy commissioner ruling against Bunnings, finding the retailer could use facial recognition to combat retail crime despite privacy concerns. The tribunal agreed Bunnings failed to properly notify customers about facial scanning but rejected the finding that the technology breached privacy rights.

5 February 2026 Β· Bunnings Β· Privacy and surveillance
5 February 2026
AII-1001-046173 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Privacy and surveillance
Country
Australia
Source
The Guardian
Date
5 February 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

The Administrative Review Tribunal reversed a November 2024 ruling by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner that found Bunnings breached privacy by scanning customer faces in stores.

Bunnings deployed facial recognition in 62 stores across New South Wales and Victoria between January 2019 and November 2021, following a two-month trial in 2018. Customer facial images were scanned and compared against a database of hundreds of banned individuals, with images deleted if no match was found within four milliseconds.

Reported impact

Hundreds of thousands of people had their faces scanned without their knowledge during the trial period.

Index analysis

The tribunal found Bunnings was entitled to use facial recognition for the limited purpose of combating retail crime and protecting staff and customers from violence, abuse and intimidation.

The tribunal agreed with the privacy commissioner that Bunnings failed to properly notify customers about facial scanning, finding general video surveillance signage was insufficient. The tribunal determined Bunnings did not comply with Australian Privacy Principles in its notification practices.

Governance controls

The tribunal found the limited impact on privacy was not disproportionate when weighed against safety benefits, and that a permitted general situation existed for collecting facial information for retail crime prevention without customer consent.

Classification

Category
Privacy and surveillance
Industry
Consumer services
Country
Australia
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Consumers, General public
Consequences
Regulatory investigation
AI systems
Bunnings facial recognition system
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

The Guardian
Bunnings given green light to use facial recognition tech on customers to combat crime
4 February 2026
Biometric Update
Partial tribunal victory allows Bunnings to keep facial recognition system | Biometric Update
4 February 2026
The Age
Bunnings wins appeal over use of facial recognition technology to fight crime
4 February 2026