Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-11927
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.

TikTok and Meta AI avatars used without adequate consent or moderation

TikTok created AI avatars of actors with limited disclosure and compensation, then deployed them to advertise products the actors had not explicitly authorized. Meta simultaneously allowed users to create AI chatbots of celebrities without permission, despite policies prohibiting such avatars, leading some public figures to seek legal protection.

25 August 2025 · TikTok · Intellectual property and appropriation
25 August 2025
AII-1002-119272 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United States
Source
The Seattle Times
Date
25 August 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

TikTok created AI avatars based on actors' likenesses without adequate disclosure of how the avatars would be used. Actor Scott Jacqmein was paid $750 and a trip to the Bay Area to license his likeness, believing the avatar would be used for one year of advertising on TikTok, but his avatar later appeared in ads for insurance, horoscope apps, and brain teasers, including one where the avatar spoke Spanish, a language Jacqmein does not speak.

Meta's Instagram platform is selectively allowing users to create AI avatar chatbots of living and deceased public figures without permission, despite Meta's stated policy prohibiting such avatars. AI avatars have been created of Indian public figures including the late Sushant Singh Rajput, Rashmika Mandanna, Ileana D'Cruz, and Vijay Joseph, as well as international figures such as Ariana Grande, Nicki Minaj, and Emma Watson.

Reported impact

Jacqmein and other actors report regret and loss of control over their images. Some performers received less than $1,000 for their likenesses and were not informed that avatars could be used on other ByteDance platforms beyond TikTok.

Celebrity AI avatars on Meta platforms risk spreading misinformation, altering public perception, and damaging reputations. Notable Indian figures including Anil Kapoor, Amitabh Bachchan, Jackie Shroff, Rajat Sharma, Arijit Singh, and Mohan Babu have sought court orders to protect their identities from AI-generated misuse.

Index analysis

TikTok's approach to avatar creation involved minimal compensation and insufficient disclosure of intended uses, creating a mismatch between what creators understood they were authorizing and how their likenesses were deployed.

Meta's inconsistent moderation of AI avatars—permitting some celebrity personas while labeling others as parody—indicates a lack of clear enforcement of its own stated policies protecting public figures' personality rights.

Governance controls

TikTok worked with an outside agency to gather footage for avatars, but the company did not disclose to participants the full scope of platforms on which avatars could appear or the range of products they could advertise.

Meta has published a policy explicitly prohibiting creation of AI avatars of living or deceased persons, but the company has taken no documented action against celebrity AI personas that violate this policy.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational
Harmed
Workers
Failure modes
Model theft, Content moderation failure
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
TikTok AI Avatars, Meta AI Avatars

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

The Seattle Times
He sold his likeness. Now his avatar is shilling supplements on TikTok
25 August 2025
MediaNama
Meta AI Avatars Raise Privacy and Ethical Concerns
26 August 2025
Sep 2026Japanese voice actor sues TikTok over AI voice cloningAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationThe Straits Timesnews.hsw.cnJul 2026Nigeria opens investigation into tech giants over media content exploitationUnder investigationIntellectual property and appropriationYahoo actualitésJul 2026Delhi High Court Restrains AI and Deepfake Misuse of Ravi Kishan's IdentityConfirmedIntellectual property and appropriationThe Times of Indiathehindu.comAsian News International (ANI)+1Jun 2026Bombay High Court allows Preity Zinta to sue over AI-generated deepfakesConfirmedIntellectual property and appropriationThe Times of IndiaThe Indian ExpressTimesNow+5Jun 2026Judge allows copyright lawsuit over Meta's use of pirated adult films for AI trainingUnder investigationIntellectual property and appropriationMashableInternational Business Times UK