Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-01923
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Tesla robotaxis crash nine times more frequently than human drivers in Austin

Tesla's autonomous robotaxis in Austin, Texas recorded nine accidents between July and November 2025, with crash rates nine times higher than conventional vehicles. The incidents included collisions with other vehicles, obstacles, a cyclist, and an animal at various speeds. Tesla reportedly removed safety observers from some prototype vehicles while Waymo's larger fleet maintains better safety records than human drivers.

July 2025 Β· Tesla Β· Safety and wellbeing
July 2025
AII-1001-01923
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Date
July 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Between July and November 2025, Tesla's autonomous robotaxis operating in Austin, Texas were involved in nine accidents. Three incidents occurred in July, including two collisions with other vehicles and one strike against a stationary obstacle at 13 km/h. Four accidents were reported in September involving collisions with obstacles, other cars during parking maneuvers, and incidents with a cyclist and an animal, with one collision at more than 43 km/h. One unexplained incident occurred in October at 29 km/h, and one accident in November repeated the July right-turn scenario.

Tesla's fleet of several dozen robotaxis in Austin traveled approximately 800,000 km between July and November, resulting in one accident per 88,000 km. This compares to the average for U.S. drivers at one accident per 800,000 km based on police records, or an estimated 320,000 km if unreported accidents are included. Tesla reportedly removed safety observers from some prototype vehicles, with independent reports suggesting these vehicles are now monitored indirectly by following vehicles.

Reported impact

The high frequency of accidents in Tesla's robotaxi fleet raises safety concerns for public use of autonomous vehicles. By comparison, Waymo operates a larger fleet of fully autonomous taxis without in-cabin safety drivers and demonstrates better accident-free performance than conventional human drivers.

Index analysis

Tesla does not typically disclose detailed information about autonomous vehicle accidents but is required to report incidents to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Unlike Tesla, Waymo provides NHTSA with detailed statistics on all incidents, including those involving injuries, highlighting a contrast in transparency and safety outcomes.

Governance controls

The high frequency of accidents and limited reporting from Tesla make it difficult for regulators and the public to fully assess the safety of its self-driving vehicles. The removal of safety observers from prototype vehicles while maintaining indirect supervision represents a shift in operational oversight.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Physical injury
Harmed
Consumers, General public
Failure modes
Unsafe autonomous behaviour
AI systems
Full Self-Driving (FSD), Waymo Driver

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident