Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-64779
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Tesla promotes Full Self-Driving to vision-impaired driver despite Level 2 limitations

Tesla North America amplified a testimonial from a vision-impaired Cybertruck buyer whose ophthalmologist reportedly recommended the vehicle's Full Self-Driving system. Tesla's promotion conflicts with its own classification of FSD as a Level 2 system requiring continuous driver attention and responsibility.

29 March 2026 Β· Tesla Β· Safety and wellbeing
29 March 2026
AII-1000-64779
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Date
29 March 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Tesla North America's official X account promoted a video interview of a new Cybertruck owner who stated his ophthalmologist recommended he purchase a Tesla with Full Self-Driving because of his deteriorating eyesight. According to the video, the driver said he did not touch the steering wheel during a 90-minute test drive and bought the Cybertruck specifically for the FSD software.

Tesla classifies FSD as a Society of Automotive Engineers Level 2 partial automation system that requires the driver to remain fully attentive and engaged at all times, with the driver remaining responsible for the vehicle. The system does not make the vehicle autonomous according to Tesla's own documentation.

Reported impact

A Level 2 system creates the illusion that the car is handling driving duties that legally and technically remain the human driver's responsibility, which is particularly problematic for someone losing their eyesight who cannot safely drive the vehicle.

Index analysis

The promotion is incompatible with Tesla's own classification of FSD as a Level 2 system requiring driver monitoring at all times and driver responsibility.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harmed
Consumers
Failure modes
Overreliance, Unsafe autonomous behaviour
AI systems
Full Self-Driving (Supervised)

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident