Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-11939
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Tesla ordered to pay $243 million over fatal Autopilot crash in Florida

A jury in federal court in Miami found Tesla liable for a fatal 2019 crash in which a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged struck two people, killing one. Tesla had rejected a $60 million settlement offer before the jury awarded $243 million in damages, which Tesla plans to appeal.

25 August 2025 Β· Tesla Β· Safety and wellbeing
25 August 2025
AII-1002-119393 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Source
TechCrunch
Date
25 August 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

In 2019, a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged struck a Chevrolet Tahoe at an intersection in Florida, hitting two people standing beside the vehicle on the shoulder. The crash killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and seriously injured her boyfriend Dillon Angulo.

In August 2025, a jury in federal court in Miami found Tesla partly to blame for the fatal crash. The jury assigned the driver two-thirds of the blame and attributed one-third to Tesla, awarding $129 million in compensatory damages (of which Tesla was found 33 percent liable, approximately $42.6 million) and $200 million in punitive damages for which Tesla was held fully responsible.

Tesla rejected a $60 million settlement proposal made in May 2025 and did not accept it within the required 30-day timeframe. The case then proceeded to trial, resulting in the $243 million verdict.

Reported impact

One person was killed and another severely injured in the crash. The verdict marks the first wrongful-death lawsuit involving a third-party victim of Autopilot to reach trial, with earlier cases either dismissed or quietly settled.

Index analysis

The case centres on Autopilot engaging but failing to brake in time to avoid the intersection. Critics argue that drivers often overestimate Autopilot's capabilities, treating it as full self-driving technology when it is a driver assistance system.

Governance controls

Tesla has denied wrongdoing and stated it plans to appeal the verdict given what it characterises as substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial. The ruling may influence how the self-driving industry describes and markets advanced driver assistance systems.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Physical death, Physical injury, Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Consumers
Failure modes
Unsafe autonomous behaviour, Overreliance
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Autopilot

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

TechCrunch
Tesla could have avoided that $242.5M Autopilot verdict, filings show | TechCrunch
25 August 2025
Reuters
Tesla rejected $60 million settlement before losing $243 million Autopilot verdict
25 August 2025
wonderfulengineering.com
Tesla ordered to pay $243 million over fatal Autopilot crash in Florida
Sep 2026US Lawmaker Presses NHTSA on Tesla Autopilot Misuse After Videos Show Sleeping DriversUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingReutersElectrekETAuto.comSep 2026US regulators probe Tesla Cybercabs for safety compliance one day after launchUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingtimesofindia.indiatimes.comThe Boston GlobeSep 2026Tesla driver cited for sleeping at wheel using Full Self-Driving on California highwayConfirmedSafety and wellbeingNew York PostSan Jose Mercury NewsSep 2026Tesla's Data Handling on Autopilot Safety Under EU Scrutiny Ahead of VoteAllegedSafety and wellbeingEl PeriΓ³dico de la EnergΓ­aQuotidiano di PugliaBusiness Insider+3Aug 2026Tesla driver falls asleep on Autopilot, police investigates in IsraelConfirmedSafety and wellbeingΧ’Χ¨Χ•Χ₯ Χ©Χ‘Χ’mako