Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-28371
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Tesla Loses $243 Million Verdict Over Fatal Autopilot Crash and Missing Data

A jury found Tesla 33% liable in a 2019 fatal crash in Florida where Autopilot failed to brake despite detecting pedestrians, and a federal judge upheld the $243 million verdict in 2026. Tesla had initially claimed Autopilot data was unrecoverable, but the victims' lawyers retrieved it, proving the system detected the hazard seconds before impact but continued accelerating.

25 April 2019 Β· Tesla Β· Safety and wellbeing
25 April 2019
AII-1000-283712 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Source
Business Insider
Date
25 April 2019
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

On April 25, 2019, in Key Largo, Florida, a vehicle driven by George McGee traveling at 60 mph on Autopilot struck two pedestrians, Dillon Angulo and Naibel Benavides Leon, at a T-junction. The vehicle's Autopilot system detected the pedestrians seconds before impact but failed to trigger emergency braking.

Tesla initially claimed that Autopilot data from the vehicle was unrecoverable. However, the victims' legal team recovered the data with the help of a specialist, proving the system had identified the hazard but continued to accelerate.

Reported impact

Naibel Benavides Leon, 22 years old, was killed in the crash. Dillon Angulo sustained catastrophic injuries.

Index analysis

In August 2025, a jury found Tesla 33% liable for the crash, ruling that the Autopilot technology was defectively designed and marketed in a way that misled users about its true capabilities. In July 2026, US District Judge Beth Bloom upheld the $243 million verdict, rejecting Tesla's appeal.

Governance controls

The court's decision noted that while the driver admitted to being distracted by his phone, Tesla's technology failed to perform its safety function despite detecting the hazard, raising questions about how the system is marketed as making driving safer while still requiring constant supervision.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Physical death, Physical injury, Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
General public
Failure modes
Unsafe autonomous behaviour
Consequences
Litigation, Fine or settlement
AI systems
Tesla Autopilot

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Business Insider
Inside a deadly Tesla Autopilot failure, and the missing crash data that revealed what happened
1 July 2026
International Business Times UK
Tesla's Missing Autopilot Data Showed It Detected A Hazard Before Fatal Crash, Despite Claims It Was Missing
1 July 2026
Sep 2026US Lawmaker Presses NHTSA on Tesla Autopilot Misuse After Videos Show Sleeping DriversUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingReutersElectrekETAuto.comSep 2026US regulators probe Tesla Cybercabs for safety compliance one day after launchUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingtimesofindia.indiatimes.comThe Boston GlobeSep 2026Tesla driver cited for sleeping at wheel using Full Self-Driving on California highwayConfirmedSafety and wellbeingNew York PostSan Jose Mercury NewsSep 2026Tesla's Data Handling on Autopilot Safety Under EU Scrutiny Ahead of VoteAllegedSafety and wellbeingEl PeriΓ³dico de la EnergΓ­aQuotidiano di PugliaBusiness Insider+3Aug 2026Tesla driver falls asleep on Autopilot, police investigates in IsraelConfirmedSafety and wellbeingΧ’Χ¨Χ•Χ₯ Χ©Χ‘Χ’mako