Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-35943
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Tesla Full Self-Driving faces safety criticism and legal challenges

Tesla's Full Self-Driving system failed repeated real-world tests, making safety-critical errors including ignoring traffic signals and hitting highway barriers. The company faces regulatory investigations, legal settlements, and criticism over marketing claims that exaggerate the system's capabilities.

22 September 2025 Β· Tesla Β· Safety and wellbeing
22 September 2025
AII-1001-359432 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Source
Forbes
Date
22 September 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A 90-minute Forbes-backed test in Los Angeles documented Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) software version 13.2.9 making seven safety-critical errors, including running red lights, failing to stop for a flashing school bus sign, and attempting to drive the wrong way down a one-way street.

Tesla enthusiasts attempting a coast-to-coast drive from New York to Los Angeles crashed their Tesla Model Y into a highway barrier in New Jersey after just 55 miles, when the vehicle failed to detect construction zone obstacles.

Reported impact

The school bus detection failure persists despite similar findings two years prior by the Dawn Project, raising questions about Tesla's safety progress claims.

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has launched a probe into Tesla's handling of crash reports involving Autopilot and Full Self-Driving. A jury in Florida ordered Tesla to pay $243 million over a 2019 Autopilot-related crash, and California's DMV is seeking to bar the company from using names like 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving' on grounds they may mislead consumers.

Index analysis

Tesla markets FSD as 'Full Self-Driving (Supervised)' but the system is categorized as Level 2 partial automation, requiring a fully attentive driver at all times. Critics argue the branding and promotion exaggerate the system's actual capabilities.

Governance controls

Tesla is piloting a robotaxi service in Austin using FSD technology, which includes a safety driver behind the wheel, unlike fully autonomous competitors such as Waymo.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Public interest, Reputational
Harmed
Consumers, General public
Failure modes
Unsafe autonomous behaviour, Agent misaction
Consequences
Litigation, Regulatory investigation, Fine or settlement
AI systems
Full Self-Driving (Supervised)
Regulations
FCRA (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Forbes
Tesla's Full-Self Driving Software Is A Mess. Should It Be Legal?
23 September 2025
Asianet News Network Pvt Ltd
Tesla FSD Makes 7 Safety-Critical Errors In LA Test Video Amid Robotaxi Push
24 September 2025
Sep 2026US Lawmaker Presses NHTSA on Tesla Autopilot Misuse After Videos Show Sleeping DriversUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingReutersElectrekETAuto.comSep 2026US regulators probe Tesla Cybercabs for safety compliance one day after launchUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingtimesofindia.indiatimes.comThe Boston GlobeSep 2026Tesla driver cited for sleeping at wheel using Full Self-Driving on California highwayConfirmedSafety and wellbeingNew York PostSan Jose Mercury NewsSep 2026Tesla's Data Handling on Autopilot Safety Under EU Scrutiny Ahead of VoteAllegedSafety and wellbeingEl PeriΓ³dico de la EnergΓ­aQuotidiano di PugliaBusiness Insider+3Aug 2026Tesla driver falls asleep on Autopilot, police investigates in IsraelConfirmedSafety and wellbeingΧ’Χ¨Χ•Χ₯ Χ©Χ‘Χ’mako