Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-45763
Well documentedThree or more independent publishers report the core facts.

Tesla FSD v12.5 Safety Study Finds Required Intervention Every 13 Miles

Independent testing of Tesla's FSD v12.5 found that drivers had to intervene more than 75 times during over 1,000 miles of testing, averaging one intervention every 13 miles. The system's unpredictable failures—such as crossing double yellow lines and stopping at green lights—combined with its generally reliable performance, reportedly create a false sense of security that could increase crash risk.

22 September 2024 · Tesla · Safety and wellbeing
22 September 2024
AII-1002-457633 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Source
Ars Technica
Date
22 September 2024
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Independent research firm AMCI Testing tested Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) v12.5 on a 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance across over 1,000 miles including city streets, interstates, mountain roads, and rural two-lane roads.

During testing, drivers had to intervene more than 75 times, averaging one intervention every 13 miles. Reported failures included the vehicle crossing double yellow lines on a twisty mountain road and stopping at a green light during city testing.

Reported impact

AMCI's testing showed that while FSD performs well in most scenarios, the relatively low rate of driver interventions may create a false sense of trust and confidence that could lead to crashes. The unpredictability of failures—with the system successfully navigating a scenario multiple times before inexplicably failing on subsequent attempts—was noted as particularly disconcerting.

Index analysis

AMCI's director of testing stated that FSD's inconsistent performance on identical road sections and intersections presents an insidious safety issue. The system's Level 2 automation requires continuous driver readiness, yet its frequent success in routine scenarios may foster complacency.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harmed
Consumers
Failure modes
Overreliance, Unsafe autonomous behaviour
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
Tesla Full Self-Driving v12.5

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Ars Technica
Tesla Full Self Driving requires human intervention every 13 miles
25 September 2024
Electrek
Tesla Full Self-Driving v12.5 first impression: more natural but still dangerous
24 September 2024
The Truth About Cars
Report: Tesla FSD Works Well Most of the Time - Until It Doesn't
25 September 2024
Sep 2026US Lawmaker Presses NHTSA on Tesla Autopilot Misuse After Videos Show Sleeping DriversUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingReutersElectrekETAuto.comSep 2026US regulators probe Tesla Cybercabs for safety compliance one day after launchUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingtimesofindia.indiatimes.comThe Boston GlobeSep 2026Tesla driver cited for sleeping at wheel using Full Self-Driving on California highwayConfirmedSafety and wellbeingNew York PostSan Jose Mercury NewsSep 2026Tesla's Data Handling on Autopilot Safety Under EU Scrutiny Ahead of VoteAllegedSafety and wellbeingEl Periódico de la EnergíaQuotidiano di PugliaBusiness Insider+3Aug 2026Tesla driver falls asleep on Autopilot, police investigates in IsraelConfirmedSafety and wellbeingערוץ שבעmako