Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-84211
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.

Tesla FSD safety claims questioned by employees and researchers

Reuters reported that Tesla FSD employees and former workers have raised concerns about the system's safety performance, including footage of near-misses and failures, while researchers disputed the methodology Tesla uses to claim superiority over human drivers. Estonia approved the Level 2 system for public road use in May 2026 following Dutch type approval.

27 May 2026 Β· Tesla Β· Safety and wellbeing
27 May 2026
AII-1000-842113 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Source
Carscoops
Date
27 May 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Reuters investigated Tesla's Full Self-Driving program and interviewed current and former employees including data labelers, engineers, researchers, and safety experts. Workers described reviewing footage of Teslas struggling with school buses, emergency vehicles, construction zones, pedestrians, and speed control, with several former employees stating they would not personally trust the system to drive them.

Reuters reported that outside researchers found major issues with Tesla's safety comparisons, alleging the company compared crashes involving airbag deployments in FSD-equipped vehicles against broader federal datasets including less severe incidents, and compared relatively new Teslas against the entire U.S. vehicle fleet averaging over a decade old.

Reported impact

Former employees described footage allegedly showing FSD-enabled Teslas striking animals, missing hazards, or requiring human intervention at the last possible second. An internal Tesla group referred to as the 'trauma team' focused on near-misses involving pedestrians, including children.

Index analysis

Tesla has publicly argued that Full Self-Driving is dramatically safer than human drivers. However, outside researchers reviewing Tesla's methodology identified methodological flaws in these comparisons.

Governance controls

Estonia's transport authority cleared Tesla's FSD for use on public roads in May 2026, recognizing a type approval first granted in the Netherlands after 18 months of testing. Tesla's FSD is classified as a level 2 driver assistance system, meaning the driver remains fully responsible and must be ready to take over immediately.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Physical injury, Other, Public interest
Harmed
Consumers, General public
Failure modes
Overreliance, Unsafe autonomous behaviour
AI systems
Full Self-Driving (FSD)
Regulations
EU AI Act (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Carscoops
Tesla's Own Workers Reportedly Wouldn't Trust FSD To Drive Them Around | Carscoops
29 May 2026
Global Banking & Finance Review
Estonia Approves Tesla FSD for Public Roads, Rollout to Begin Soon
29 May 2026
The Telegraph
Tesla's AI trainers reveal major gaps in its self-driving tech and safety claims
29 May 2026
Sep 2026US Lawmaker Presses NHTSA on Tesla Autopilot Misuse After Videos Show Sleeping DriversUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingReutersElectrekETAuto.comSep 2026US regulators probe Tesla Cybercabs for safety compliance one day after launchUnder investigationSafety and wellbeingtimesofindia.indiatimes.comThe Boston GlobeSep 2026Tesla driver cited for sleeping at wheel using Full Self-Driving on California highwayConfirmedSafety and wellbeingNew York PostSan Jose Mercury NewsSep 2026Tesla's Data Handling on Autopilot Safety Under EU Scrutiny Ahead of VoteAllegedSafety and wellbeingEl PeriΓ³dico de la EnergΓ­aQuotidiano di PugliaBusiness Insider+3Aug 2026Tesla driver falls asleep on Autopilot, police investigates in IsraelConfirmedSafety and wellbeingΧ’Χ¨Χ•Χ₯ Χ©Χ‘Χ’mako