Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-19287
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Tesla FSD crash lawsuit: Cybertruck strikes overpass barrier in Texas

A Tesla Cybertruck with Full Self-Driving enabled struck an overpass barrier on a Houston highway in August 2025. The vehicle owner filed a lawsuit seeking over $1 million in damages, alleging the system failed to recognize the road geometry and that Tesla's design decisions, including rejection of lidar sensors in favor of cameras only, made the vehicle unsafe.

18 August 2025 Β· Tesla Β· Safety and wellbeing
18 August 2025
AII-1001-19287
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Date
18 August 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

On August 18, 2025, Justine Saint Amour drove a Cybertruck with Full Self-Driving (FSD) enabled on Eastex Highway 69 near Houston, Texas. When the vehicle approached a Y-shaped overpass junction near the 256 Eastex park-and-ride facility, the Cybertruck attempted to drive straight ahead instead of following the right-side curve, striking a concrete barrier on the edge of the overpass.

Saint Amour attempted to disable FSD and regain control, but was unable to prevent the collision. The lawsuit was filed in Harris County District Court and names 16 specific negligence claims.

Reported impact

Saint Amour filed a lawsuit seeking damages exceeding $1 million. The lawsuit alleges that the Cybertruck and its FSD feature had design and marketing defects, including lack of effective driver monitoring, absence of lidar sensors, ineffective automatic emergency braking, and misleading marketing of the system as 'autonomous driving.'

Index analysis

The incident reflects a broader pattern of Tesla FSD collisions. A federal judge recently upheld a $243 million judgment in a separate Tesla Autopilot crash case. The lawsuit alleges that Tesla engineers recommended integrating radar and lidar sensors for safety, similar to competitors like Waymo, but that this recommendation was rejected.

Governance controls

The lawsuit claims Tesla executives made vehicle design decisions that prioritized camera-only vision systems over sensors that competitors use, and characterizes the decision-maker as 'a reckless and irresponsible promoter who has long made dangerous design choices and over-promised product capabilities.'

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property
Harmed
Consumers
Failure modes
Unsafe autonomous behaviour
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Full Self-Driving (FSD), Tesla Autopilot

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident