Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-50447
Well documentedThree or more independent publishers report the core facts.

Study finds AI chatbots fail to prevent conspiracy theory promotion

Researchers from the Digital Media Research Centre tested six widely-used AI chatbots and found that many failed to refuse or correct conspiracy theories when asked about them, with some actively encouraging further discussion. The study tested systems from OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Perplexity, and xAI on nine theories including debunked claims and newer election-related conspiracy theories.

24 November 2025 Β· OpenAI Β· Misinformation and synthetic media
24 November 2025
AII-1001-504475 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Country
Australia
Source
The Conversation
Date
24 November 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Researchers from the Digital Media Research Centre tested six AI chatbots by posing questions about nine conspiracy theories using a "casually curious" persona.

The chatbots tested were ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4 Mini, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini Flash 1.5, Perplexity, and Grok-2 Mini in both default and "Fun Mode" versions.

The theories included both long-debunked claims such as the JFK assassination and chemtrails, and newer conspiracy theories related to breaking news including false claims about the 2024 U.S. election.

Reported impact

Many chatbots did not shut down conversations about conspiracy theories and some actively encouraged them, raising concerns about the effectiveness of safety guardrails.

The research is cause for concern given how easily people can fall down conspiracy thinking, particularly when casually curious users interact with systems that fail to correct misinformation.

Index analysis

Safety guardrails are checks and balances designed to prevent chatbots from creating harmful content, but the study examined whether these guardrails were satisfactory in protecting users from conspiracy theory exposure.

Governance controls

The research has been accepted for publication in a special issue of M/C Journal and examines the adequacy of existing safety measures on deployed chatbot systems.

Classification

Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Australia
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Public interest
Harmed
General public
Failure modes
Content moderation failure, Agent misaction
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4 Mini, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini Flash 1.5, Perplexity, Grok-2 Mini

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

The Conversation
AI chatbots are encouraging conspiracy theories - new research
24 November 2025
Business Standard
AI chatbots are still fuelling conspiracy theories, warns new research
24 November 2025
Devdiscourse
Chatbot Safety: Navigating Conspiracy Theories in AI Conversations | Technology
24 November 2025
Mirage News
AI Chatbots Fueling Conspiracy Theories: Study Finds
24 November 2025
National Herald
Chatbots found to fuel conspiracy theories despite safety guardrails, study warns
24 November 2025