Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-52771
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.

Stanford Professor Accused of Using AI to Create Fake Citations in Deepfake Law Defense

Attorneys challenging Minnesota's anti-deepfake law allege that Stanford professor Jeff Hancock, who submitted an expert declaration defending the law, used AI to generate false academic citations that do not exist in any database. The discovery raises concerns about AI hallucination in legal proceedings and the credibility of expert testimony on AI-related matters.

21 November 2024 Β· Jeff Hancock Β· Reliability and hallucination
21 November 2024
AII-1002-527718 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
United States
Source
The Verge
Date
21 November 2024
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Jeff Hancock, founding director of the Stanford Social Media Lab, submitted a 12-page expert declaration supporting Minnesota's anti-deepfake law at the request of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison. Opposing counsel representing a conservative YouTuber and Republican state Rep. Mary Franson discovered that multiple academic sources cited in the declaration appear not to exist.

Reported impact

Plaintiffs' attorneys claim the declaration cited a study titled 'The Influence of Deepfake Videos on Political Attitudes and Behavior' purportedly published in the Journal of Information Technology & Politics in 2023, but the article cannot be found in the journal or academic databases. Libertarian law professor Eugene Volokh also identified another cited study, 'Deepfakes and the Illusion of Authenticity: Cognitive Processes Behind Misinformation Acceptance,' as appearing not to exist.

Index analysis

Opposing attorneys suggest the false citations bear hallmarks of an AI 'hallucination' likely generated by a large language model such as ChatGPT, questioning how this ended up in Hancock's declaration. The incident is particularly concerning given Hancock's expertise in technology and misinformation, and has sparked debate about the appropriate use of AI in legal proceedings.

Governance controls

The false citations emerged during litigation challenging Minnesota's anti-deepfake law on First Amendment grounds, raising questions about expert testimony standards in cases involving AI-generated content.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Reputational, Public interest
Harmed
General public
Failure modes
Hallucination, Fabricated citation
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
ChatGPT
Regulations
EU AI Act (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

The Verge
An anti-deepfake declaration may have been written by AI
21 November 2024
Gizmodo
Stanford Professor Accused of Using AI to Write Expert Testimony Criticizing Deepfakes
21 November 2024
International Business Times
Misinformation Expert Accused of Citing Fake Sources in Defense of Anti-Misinformation Law
21 November 2024
TechSpot
Expert defends anti-AI misinformation law using chatbot-written misinformation
21 November 2024
ReadWrite
Affidavit filed to support Minnesota deepfake law undermined by AI
22 November 2024
Breitbart
Hypocrite Alert: Stanford Prof Accused of Using AI to Write Legal Document Attacking AI-Generated Deepfakes
23 November 2024
San Jose Mercury News
Stanford professor likely used AI chatbot like ChatGPT for court submission, lawyers claim
23 November 2024
foxnews.com
Stanford Professor Accused of Using AI to Create Fake Citations in Deepfake Law Defense
Dec 2024Stanford misinformation expert used ChatGPT that generated false citations in court filingConfirmedReliability and hallucinationAlternet.orgTechdirtThe Express Tribune+3Sep 2026Stanford University used AI to alter student photos without consentConfirmedDiscrimination and fairnessThe New York TimesNew York PostKRON4+4Sep 2026Stanford Used Generative AI to Alter Student Photo for Campus BannerConfirmedDiscrimination and fairnessstanforddaily.comstanfordreview.orgsfchronicle.comSep 2026AI agents in simulated environments exhibit harmful behaviors without developer oversightWell documentedSafety and wellbeingδΈ­ε›½η»ζ΅Žη½‘ai.cnmo.comwap.eastmoney.com+5Aug 2026AI System Designs and Synthesizes Novel Viruses, Raising Biosecurity ConcernsWell documentedSecurity and cyberattacksBBCForbesThe Independent+1