Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-94593
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

South Korea privacy watchdog flags AI digital textbook privacy gaps

South Korea's privacy watchdog released findings from a preliminary inspection of the AI Digital Textbook system deployed in March 2025, identifying inadequate transparency in how student personal information was collected and protected. The regulator recommended the Ministry of Education and KERIS improve security standards, clarify data processing policies, and ensure information subjects understood how their data was being used.

15 May 2025 ยท Ministry of Education ยท Privacy and surveillance
15 May 2025
AII-1001-945932 sources โ†“
Quick facts
Category
Privacy and surveillance
Country
South Korea
Source
๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์‹ ๋ฌธ
Date
15 May 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

The AI Digital Textbook, introduced in March 2025 by South Korea's Ministry of Education and operated by KERIS, collects students' personal information including academic performance and learning history to provide customized educational content.

South Korea's Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) conducted a preliminary inspection of the system and published findings on May 15, 2025, identifying gaps in personal information protection measures.

Reported impact

The PIPC found that KERIS inadequately disclosed the categories, purposes, and retention periods of personal information being processed in consent forms and privacy policies, leaving information subjects unaware of how their data was being used.

The system stored student learning data in a centralized learning data repository for future AI-based analysis without clearly stating what personal information was being processed or for what purposes.

Index analysis

The AI textbook met basic security standards including National Intelligence Service security review and cloud security certification, but security controls were focused narrowly on cloud infrastructure.

System integration between the centralized portal and individual development companies presented potential security vulnerabilities that required ongoing monitoring and inspection.

The PIPC noted that security standards and developer guidelines emphasized cloud security at the expense of compliance with data protection law requirements.

Governance controls

The PIPC recommended that the Ministry of Education and KERIS obtain Personal Information Protection Certification (ISMS-P) and ensure security measures met legal standards.

The PIPC recommended that KERIS clarify personal information processing policies and consent forms, explicitly state how personal information was handled, and ensure information subjects could exercise their rights.

The PIPC advised the Ministry of Education to embed data protection law requirements into AI textbook approval standards, guidelines, and post-deployment inspection systems.

Classification

Category
Privacy and surveillance
Industry
Education and training
Country
South Korea
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harmed
Children
Consequences
None recorded, Regulatory investigation
AI systems
AI Digital Textbook
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์‹ ๋ฌธ
๊ฐœ์ธ์ •๋ณด์œ„ "AI ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ, ํ•™์ƒ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ •๋ณด ๋ณดํ˜ธ ์กฐ์น˜ ๋ฏธํก"
15 May 2025
์—ฐํ•ฉ๋‰ด์Šค
"AI๋””์ง€ํ„ธ๊ต๊ณผ์„œ ๊ฐœ์ธ์ •๋ณด ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ๋ฏธํก"...๊ต์œก๋‹น๊ตญ์— ์‹œ์ • ๊ถŒ๊ณ  | ์—ฐํ•ฉ๋‰ด์Šค
15 May 2025