Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-44727
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Security Robots Suspended at Basel Autumn Fair Over Data Protection Concerns

Autonomous security robots with 360-degree and thermal cameras deployed overnight at Basel's Autumn Fair were suspended after the canton's Data Protection Commissioner discovered the system had not received regulatory approval and raised concerns about personality rights violations and unclear data storage practices.

31 October 2025 Β· Basler Herbstmesse Β· Privacy and surveillance
31 October 2025
AII-1001-44727
Quick facts
Category
Privacy and surveillance
Country
Switzerland
Date
31 October 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Two autonomous security robots equipped with 360-degree and thermal imaging cameras patrolled the Basel Autumn Fair overnight between 11 p.m. and 8 a.m. to monitor the fairground.

The Data Protection Commissioner of Basel-Stadt, Danielle Kaufmann, was not notified of the deployment and discovered the robots during an inspection. She determined that the canton had not authorized the use of the camera robots.

Kaufmann raised concerns that the robots violated personality rights, noting that people walking at night also have data protection rights. She was unclear about where and how long recordings were stored and who had access to the data.

Reported impact

The Data Protection Commissioner issued an order suspending the use of the security robots at the fair pending clarification of data protection requirements.

Index analysis

The robots' 360-degree surveillance and use of artificial intelligence to process recordings represented a larger privacy issue than conventional video monitoring, according to the commissioner.

Governance controls

The fair operator acknowledged that no prior consultation with the Data Protection Commissioner had taken place before deploying the robots. Securitas stated the systems were proven technology already in use for two years.

The operator stated that data would be transmitted to a control center where people would be made unrecognizable, and alerts would only be triggered for unusual activity. However, these measures did not satisfy the commissioner's concerns.

Classification

Category
Privacy and surveillance
Industry
Robots, sensors and IT hardware
Country
Switzerland
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
General public
Consequences
System suspension or termination
AI systems
Ascento security robots
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident