Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-64843
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

SASSA Facial-Verification Failures Disrupt Social Grant Access in South Africa

SASSA's e-Life Certification biometric verification system experienced technical failures that disrupted social grant beneficiary access, causing long queues at offices and resulting in approximately 68,000 grant suspensions. The system glitches in the platform's interdepartmental connections prevented beneficiaries from completing mandatory life certification online.

September 2025 Β· South African Social Security Agency Β· Reliability and hallucination
September 2025
AII-1000-64843
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
South Africa
Date
September 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

SASSA implemented the e-Life Certification system, a self-service digital platform using biometric verification through the electronic Know Your Client (eKYC) system, to conduct mandatory life certification for social grant beneficiaries starting in September 2025.

System glitches in the e-Life Certification platform caused delays and disruptions in completing life certification, leading to long queues at SASSA offices and preventing some beneficiaries from accessing the self-service portal.

By March 2026, approximately one million beneficiaries had been processed through the biometric verification rollout across SASSA's 432 offices, with 67,868 grants suspended in the third quarter alone due to non-compliance with the verification process.

Reported impact

Beneficiaries were unable to access the e-Life Certification self-service portal and faced long queues at SASSA offices, incurring transport costs and time delays to complete mandatory life certification.

Nearly 68,000 grants were suspended under the biometric rollout due to beneficiaries' failure to comply with the verification notification, affecting their access to social assistance.

Index analysis

The e-Life Certification system relied on system interfaces with other departments; system glitches in these interdepartmental connections caused the platform failures and service disruptions.

The biometric verification process was intended to prevent identity fraud and ensure only qualifying beneficiaries remained on the system, but implementation failures created barriers to legitimate beneficiary access.

Governance controls

SASSA stated that communication and notification processes governing the mandatory verification are guided by existing regulations under the Social Assistance Act, though the department confirmed no standalone research report has been conducted on communication effectiveness.

SASSA outlined a structured enforcement process in which grants are suspended 2 months after a beneficiary is notified to conduct a review and has not yet done so, with suspensions and lapses tracked quarterly.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
South Africa
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Human or fundamental rights, Public interest
Harmed
Consumers, General public
Consequences
System suspension or termination
AI systems
e-Life Certification
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident