Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-45389
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Pieces Technologies settles claim of misleading AI accuracy statements

Pieces Technologies agreed to a settlement with Texas Attorney General after allegedly making false claims about the accuracy of its generative AI products used in hospitals. The company reportedly used misleading metrics claiming error rates below 1 per 100,000, which an investigation found to be inaccurate and potentially deceptive.

18 September 2024 Β· Pieces Technologies Β· Reliability and hallucination
18 September 2024
AII-1002-453892 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
United States
Source
texasattorneygeneral.gov
Date
18 September 2024
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Pieces Technologies deployed its generative AI products at several Texas hospitals to summarize patients' conditions and treatment. The company developed metrics claiming its healthcare AI products were 'highly accurate' with a 'severe hallucination rate' of '<1 per 100,000' and a 'critical hallucination rate' of '<.001%'.

An investigation by the Texas Attorney General found that these metrics were likely inaccurate and may have deceived hospitals about the accuracy and safety of Pieces' products.

Reported impact

At least four major Texas hospitals provided patients' healthcare data in real time to Pieces for its generative AI product to process. The deceptive claims about accuracy put the public interest at risk by potentially misleading hospital staff about the reliability of AI-generated summaries used in patient treatment decisions.

Index analysis

The products exhibited hallucination behavior, with actual error rates appearing to exceed the claimed metrics. Pieces developed accuracy metrics that did not reflect the true performance of its generative AI systems.

Governance controls

As part of the settlement, Pieces agreed to clearly and conspicuously disclose the definition of any metrics used to describe its generative AI products' output and the methods used to calculate such metrics. Pieces also agreed to prohibit false, misleading, or unsubstantiated representations regarding any feature or appropriate use of its products, and must document known or reasonably known harmful or potentially harmful uses or misuses for current and future customers.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Healthcare, drugs and biotechnology
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Public interest, Economic or property
Harmed
Consumers, Business
Failure modes
Hallucination
Consequences
Fine or settlement, Regulatory investigation
AI systems
Pieces generative AI healthcare product
Regulations
FCRA (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

texasattorneygeneral.gov
Pieces Technologies settles claim of misleading AI accuracy statements
sidley.com
Pieces Technologies settles claim of misleading AI accuracy statements
Aug 2025Texas investigates Meta and Character.AI for misleading children with AI mental health chatbotsUnder investigationReliability and hallucinationTechCrunchnews.bloomberglaw.comSahara Reporters+4May 2026Texas Sues Netflix for Data Collection and Addictive DesignAllegedPrivacy and surveillanceCBS NewsThe GuardianHindustan TimesFeb 2026Samsung settles Texas lawsuit over smart TV data collectionConfirmedPrivacy and surveillanceFirst-Class κ²½μ œμ‹ λ¬Έ νŒŒμ΄λ‚Έμ…œλ‰΄μŠ€μ—°ν•©λ‰΄μŠ€TVJan 2026Texas lawmakers call for investigation into Grok AI for generating sexualized images of minorsUnder investigationHarmful and abusive contentHouston Public MediaFOX 4 News Dallas-Fort WorthKXAN Austin+1Dec 2025Texas sues five smart TV makers over deceptive ACR data collectionAllegedPrivacy and surveillancetherecord.mediaMediaPost