Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-90261
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

OpenAI's o3 and o4 mini models show elevated hallucination rates

OpenAI's newly released o3 and o4 mini reasoning models show hallucination rates of 33% and 48% respectively, according to the company's internal benchmarks, which are higher than previous models despite improvements in coding and visual reasoning capabilities. The company has acknowledged the finding but stated further research is needed to understand why the models generate more false information.

16 April 2025 Β· OpenAI Β· Reliability and hallucination
16 April 2025
AII-1001-90261
Quick facts
Organization
OpenAI (subject)
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
United States
Date
16 April 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

OpenAI released new reasoning models o3 and o4 mini on April 16, 2025. According to OpenAI's internal Person QA benchmark, o3 exhibited hallucination in 33% of questions and o4 mini in 48% of questions.

These hallucination rates were more than double those of earlier reasoning models o1 (16%) and o3 mini (14.8%), and exceeded the non-reasoning model GPT-4o. Hallucination refers to AI generating information that does not exist as if it were factual.

Reported impact

Industry analysts noted this pattern was unusual, as hallucination issues typically improved incrementally with each new model release. The higher hallucination rates could hinder adoption in high-accuracy fields such as law, accounting, and tax services.

Index analysis

OpenAI's technical report suggested the models made more assertions overall than previous versions, leading to both more accurate and more inaccurate or hallucinated statements. OpenAI stated that understanding why reasoning model scaling leads to worse hallucination requires further research.

Governance controls

OpenAI acknowledged that completely eliminating hallucination across all problem domains remains an ongoing research challenge and stated it continues efforts to increase accuracy and reliability.

Classification

Organization
OpenAI (subject)
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Healthcare, drugs and biotechnology
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Reputational
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Hallucination
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
ChatGPT o3, ChatGPT o4-mini

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident