Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-02367
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.

OpenAI ChatGPT Content Safety Explicit Image Bypass

Mindgard researchers demonstrated that ChatGPT's content safety guardrails could be bypassed through system prompt manipulation to generate sexualized images of real and fictitious persons. The vulnerability was discovered on January 1, 2026 and disclosed to OpenAI on January 28, 2026 before being published publicly.

1 January 2026 Β· OpenAI Β· Security and cyberattacks
1 January 2026
AII-1001-023672 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Security and cyberattacks
Country
United States
Source
mindgard.ai
Date
1 January 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Mindgard researchers discovered that OpenAI's ChatGPT guardrails could be circumvented to generate images of fictitious and real-life persons that can be manipulated into sexualized positions. The technique involved splicing a more liberated system prompt onto the user's preferences that ChatGPT refers to in the Model Set Context at the start of a chat, using a system prompt extracted from the model.

Reported impact

The vulnerability could enable the creation of non-consensual sexually explicit deepfake images of real people. Mindgard noted that while the process was more complicated than similar exploits in Grok, it exposed potential reputational and regulatory risk to enterprises deploying AI systems.

Index analysis

Mindgard's investigation revealed weaknesses in ChatGPT's custom memory, bio tool, content filters, and susceptibility to faux-system prompts. The researchers found that guardrails relying on layered filtering and assumed user compliance are brittle, and that session-level behavior can diverge from intended policy through routing and filtering weaknesses without accessing model weights or backend systems.

Governance controls

Mindgard disclosed the techniques to OpenAI prior to publishing their findings. Mindgard concluded that image moderation pipelines require adversarial testing and that enterprises must continuously test AI systems under real-world attack conditions to manage reputational and regulatory risk.

Classification

Category
Security and cyberattacks
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Reputational, Other
Harmed
General public
Failure modes
Jailbreak, Prompt injection, Manipulation or dark pattern, Content moderation failure
AI systems
ChatGPT

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

mindgard.ai
OpenAI ChatGPT Content Safety Explicit Image Bypass
mindgard.ai
Mindgard Disclosure