Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-91483
Well documentedThree or more independent publishers report the core facts.

NIO sues companies over counterfeit NOMI AI systems

NIO filed lawsuits against multiple companies for producing counterfeit versions of NOMI, its in-vehicle AI interactive system. The automaker alleged the counterfeits posed safety risks including component detachment during collisions and lacked proper vehicle-specification verification, while also copying NOMI's design elements.

12 June 2026 · NIO · Intellectual property and appropriation
12 June 2026
AII-1000-914835 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
China
Source
和讯网
Date
12 June 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

NIO's legal department announced on June 12, 2026, that it had discovered proliferating counterfeiting and imitation of NOMI, NIO's in-vehicle intelligent interactive system deployed since 2017, in the market. Some merchants without authorization produced and sold electronic products with similar physical appearance to NOMI and distributed them through online channels.

NIO identified two types of infringement: counterfeiters copying NOMI's physical form, and others copying its core design elements including visual expressions, interaction logic, and interface layout for use in other vehicle cabins. NIO also alleged that some social media accounts and self-media outlets fabricated false comparison content and misleading interactive scenarios to defame NOMI and mislead consumers.

Reported impact

NIO stated that counterfeit products had not undergone vehicle-specification verification and were prone to failures in complex conditions such as high temperatures, electromagnetic interference, and vehicle vibration, with risks including circuit short circuits and component detachment. In extreme cases, these unverified components could become detached or shatter during vehicle collisions or emergency braking, potentially causing secondary injuries to occupants.

NIO warned that counterfeit products copying NOMI's design elements lacked proper safety architecture and could exhibit unintended triggering and response lag in actual driving scenarios, increasing driver cognitive load and affecting driving safety. Counterfeit products also lacked the safety performance validation that NOMI Mate achieved through C-NCAP and E-NCAP certifications.

Index analysis

The incident reflects intellectual property infringement through both physical product counterfeiting and design copying in the automotive AI sector. The counterfeits targeted NOMI Mate, which has delivered nearly 50 industry-first or leading features and technical breakthroughs since its 2017 launch.

Governance controls

NIO stated it completed notarized preservation of evidence of infringement and filed civil lawsuits and administrative complaints against the Zhejiang company, Guangzhou company, and Shanghai company. NIO indicated a zero-tolerance policy toward counterfeiting and stated it would pursue multiple legal remedies to protect intellectual property and defend industry health.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Mobility and autonomous vehicles
Country
China
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Physical injury, Economic or property
Harmed
Consumers, Business
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
NOMI Mate

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

和讯网
蔚来法务部警告"山寨NOMI"存安全隐患:已对多家公司提起诉讼-汽车频道-和讯网
12 June 2026
证券之星
蔚来法务部:抄袭仿冒NOMI愈演愈烈 已对多家公司提起诉讼
12 June 2026
凤凰网(凤凰新媒体)
蔚来法务部警告"山寨NOMI"存安全隐患:已对多家公司提起诉讼
12 June 2026
新浪香港
蔚來對多家公司提起訴訟
13 June 2026
21jingji.com
蔚来对多家公司提起诉讼 - 21经济网
13 June 2026