Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-95177
Under investigationA regulator, court or police has opened a formal inquiry and reached no finding yet.

New Orleans Police Used Real-Time Facial Recognition Despite Local Ordinance

New Orleans Police reportedly used a real-time facial recognition system operated by Project NOLA to automatically alert officers to potential suspects, playing a role in dozens of arrests, despite a city ordinance restricting such use. The practice was paused in April after a Washington Post investigation, and the police superintendent ordered a review of whether it violated local restrictions.

19 May 2025 Β· New Orleans Police Department Β· Privacy and surveillance
19 May 2025
AII-1001-951772 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Privacy and surveillance
Country
United States
Source
washingtonpost.com
Date
19 May 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Over the past two years, New Orleans Police relied on a privately owned network of cameras equipped with facial recognition software operated by Project NOLA to automatically monitor the streets for wanted people and send real-time alerts to officers' mobile phones with names and locations of possible matches.

According to court records, these cameras played a role in dozens of arrests, but most uses were never disclosed in police reports and were not included in the department's mandatory reports to the city council.

Reported impact

Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, stated: 'this is the facial recognition technology nightmare scenario that we have been worried about. This is the government giving itself the power to track anyone --- for that matter, everyone --- as we go about our lives walking around in public.'

Index analysis

The use of automated real-time facial recognition alerts violated a city ordinance that limited police use of facial recognition to still images of specific suspects in violent crime investigations, which required submission to a state fusion center in Baton Rouge for verification by trained examiners before deployment.

Governance controls

In April, after The Washington Post requested public records about the system, New Orleans Police Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick paused the automated alerts and ordered a review into how officers used the technology and whether the practice violated local restrictions on facial recognition.

Classification

Category
Privacy and surveillance
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights, Public interest
Harmed
General public
Consequences
System suspension or termination, Regulatory investigation
AI systems
Project NOLA Facial Recognition System
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

washingtonpost.com
New Orleans Police Used Real-Time Facial Recognition Despite Local Ordinance
au.news.yahoo.com
New Orleans Police Used Real-Time Facial Recognition Despite Local Ordinance