Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-11337
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Metropolitan Police Uses Palantir AI System to Flag Officer Misconduct

The Metropolitan Police deployed Palantir's AI tools in a time-limited pilot to analyse officer data on sickness, absences and overtime patterns to identify professional standards issues. The Police Federation criticised the system as 'automated suspicion' that could misinterpret workload pressures as misconduct, while the Met stated that human officers make final determinations rather than the AI system alone.

20 February 2026 Β· Palantir Technologies Β· Governance, accountability and labour
20 February 2026
AII-1001-11337View source β†—
Quick facts
Category
Governance, accountability and labour
Country
United Kingdom
Source
The Guardian
Date
20 February 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

The Metropolitan Police confirmed it is using Palantir's AI tools to analyse internal data about sickness levels, absences from duty and overtime patterns in an effort to identify potential shortcomings in professional standards.

The system operates as a time-limited pilot by bringing together data from multiple existing internal databases. The Met stated the aim was to 'help us identify these patterns of behaviour in our officers and staff' and was 'part of our wider effort to drive up standards and improve the Met's culture'.

Reported impact

The Police Federation condemned the deployment, characterising the approach as 'automated suspicion' and stating that officers 'must not be subjected to opaque or untested tools that risk misinterpreting unsustainable workload pressures, sickness or overtime as indicators of wrongdoing'.

A Police Federation spokesperson warned that 'any system that profiles officers using algorithmic patterns must be treated with extreme caution' and called for the focus to remain 'on proper supervision, fair processes and human judgment, not the automation of suspicion'.

Index analysis

The Met stated there is 'evidence to suggest a correlation between significant levels of sickness, increased absences or unusually high overtime, and failings in standards, culture and behaviour'.

The Met added that 'Palantir's systems help to identify the patterns, but it is officers who then explore further and make any determinations on standards, performance or other issues'.

Governance controls

The Met described the Palantir pilot as time-limited. The force emphasised that officers, not the AI system, make final determinations on standards, performance or other issues.

Classification

Category
Governance, accountability and labour
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
United Kingdom
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Workers
Failure modes
Biased model
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
Palantir AI tools
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

The Guardian
Met police using AI tools supplied by Palantir to flag officer misconduct
22 February 2026