Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-50753
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Megan Thee Stallion wins defamation case over AI deepfake pornography

A jury found blogger Milagro Cooper liable for posting defamatory statements and circulating an AI-generated pornographic deepfake video of rapper Megan Thee Stallion without consent. The case was one of the first to test Florida's deepfake law, which allows victims to sue over AI-generated explicit content shared without consent, and addressed whether the defendant qualified as media under state law.

26 November 2025 Β· Milagro Cooper Β· Harmful and abusive content
26 November 2025
AII-1001-50753
Quick facts
Category
Harmful and abusive content
Country
United States
Date
26 November 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Blogger Milagro Cooper, known online as Milagro Gramz, posted false and harmful statements about rapper Megan Thee Stallion on social media and circulated an AI-generated pornographic deepfake video without consent.

A jury found Cooper liable for defamation, invasion of privacy, and emotional distress in a Miami federal court. Cooper allegedly participated in a targeted social media campaign alongside rapper Tory Lanez to harass, intimidate and defame Thee Stallion, particularly regarding a 2020 shooting incident in which Lanez shot Thee Stallion in the foot.

Reported impact

Thee Stallion testified that the deepfake video and defamatory posts caused severe emotional distress and damaged her mental health and career. She reported losing at least four music contracts worth approximately $1 million each due to the controversy.

Thee Stallion said she completed a four-week therapy program costing $240,000 while struggling with feelings of hopelessness, and that the ordeal left her feeling 'her life was not worth living.' A music producer testified that the controversy cost her major business opportunities.

Index analysis

The case was one of the first to test Florida's new deepfake law, which allows victims to sue over AI-generated explicit content shared without consent. A key legal question in the trial was whether Cooper qualified as media under Florida state law, which could have affected the strength of Thee Stallion's claims.

Classification

Category
Harmful and abusive content
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Economic or property, Human or fundamental rights, Psychological, Reputational
Failure modes
Deepfake video
Consequences
Litigation
Regulations
EU AI Act (cited)

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident