Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-94971
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Medical AI Chatbots Vulnerable to Prompt Injection Attacks

A research team from Seoul Asan Hospital and Inha University Hospital tested three commercial medical AI models against prompt injection attacks and found them vulnerable 94.4% of the time, including susceptibility to malicious commands that caused them to recommend contraindicated medications to pregnant women.

5 January 2026 Β· Security and cyberattacks
5 January 2026
AII-1000-94971
Quick facts
Category
Security and cyberattacks
Country
South Korea
Date
5 January 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A research team from Seoul Asan Hospital and Inha University Hospital analyzed the security vulnerabilities of three commercial medical AI modelsβ€”GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-2.0-flash-lite, and Claude 3 Haikuβ€”by testing them against prompt injection attacks using 12 clinical scenarios. Prompt injection attacks involve malicious commands embedded in prompts to make AI models operate contrary to their intended purpose.

The team tested two attack methods: context-aware prompt injection using patient information to disrupt model judgment, and evidence manipulation to fabricate convincing false information. The models were evaluated on scenarios ranging from recommending herbal alternatives to diabetes patients (medium risk) to recommending fetal-damaging medications to pregnant women (highest risk). Across 216 total conversations, the combined attack success rate was 94.4%, with rates of 100% for medium-risk scenarios, 93.3% for high-risk scenarios, and 91.7% for highest-risk scenarios.

Reported impact

The research identified that all three AI models were vulnerable to recommending contraindicated medications to pregnant women. When compromised answers appeared, they persisted through subsequent conversation turns at rates exceeding 80% across all three models, indicating that once safety safeguards failed, dangerous guidance could continue throughout the interaction.

Index analysis

The study represents the first systematic analysis of medical AI models' vulnerability to prompt injection attacks. The researcher noted that medical AI models are structurally vulnerable to intentional manipulation beyond simple errors, and current safety mechanisms alone are insufficient to block malicious attacks that induce contraindicated drug recommendations.

Governance controls

The research team recommended that before deploying patient-facing medical chatbots or remote consultation systems, AI models must be thoroughly tested for vulnerabilities and security verification systems should be made mandatory.

Classification

Category
Security and cyberattacks
Industry
Healthcare, drugs and biotechnology
Country
South Korea
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Pre-deployment
Harm types
Public interest
Harmed
Consumers, Women
Failure modes
Agent misaction, Manipulation or dark pattern, Prompt injection, Unsafe autonomous behaviour, Unsafe recommendation
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
Claude 3 Haiku, Gemini-2.0-flash-lite, GPT-4o-mini

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident