Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-06899
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Lawyer Fined for Submitting 48 Fake AI-Generated Legal Citations in Tenerife

A lawyer in Tenerife was fined €420 by the regional superior court for submitting an appeal containing 48 fabricated legal citations generated by an AI tool without verification. The court found the lawyer violated duties of truthfulness and good faith by failing to check the AI output against official legal databases.

13 February 2026 Β· Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Catalunya Β· Reliability and hallucination
13 February 2026
AII-1001-06899
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
Spain
Date
13 February 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

The Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias (TSJC) fined a lawyer €420 for submitting an appeal with 48 false citations to Supreme Court rulings and a Council General of Judicial Power report in a case before the Provincial Court of Santa Cruz de Tenerife.

The lawyer used a generalist AI tool not designed for legal work to generate the citations and did not verify them against any official legal databases or confirm that the sentence numbers, dates, and identifiers actually existed.

Reported impact

The TSJC found that the lawyer's failure to perform human supervision and verification of the AI output violated the duty of truthfulness, rules of good faith, and abused the public justice system.

Index analysis

The court determined that no verification was conducted to check whether the AI-generated references corresponded to real resolutions or reports, and the lawyer did not consult the universal and free Centro de DocumentaciΓ³n Judicial database even once to verify any of the citations.

Governance controls

The TSJC has referred the case to the lawyer's professional bar association to determine whether additional disciplinary sanctions are warranted.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
Spain
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Public interest
Harmed
Government
Failure modes
Fabricated citation, Hallucination, Overreliance
Consequences
Fine or settlement
AI systems
Unspecified generalist AI tool
Regulations
EU AI Act (cited)

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident