Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-87743
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Kenya Court Rules Meta Can Be Sued Over Content in Ethiopia Violence

Kenya's High Court ruled that Meta can be sued over allegations that its Facebook platform promoted violent content during Ethiopia's 2020-2022 Tigray civil war. Plaintiffs, including researchers and The Katiba Institute, allege that the platform's recommendation algorithms amplified content inciting violence, with one plaintiff claiming his father was killed following threatening Facebook posts.

3 April 2025 Β· Meta Β· Harmful and abusive content
3 April 2025
AII-1001-877435 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Harmful and abusive content
Country
Ethiopia
Source
the Guardian
Date
3 April 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

The High Court of Kenya ruled on Thursday that Meta can be sued in the country over its alleged role in disseminating content that incited violence in Ethiopia during the 2020-2022 civil war in the Tigray region. The case was initiated by The Katiba Institute and two Ethiopian researchers, Abrham Meareg and Fisseha Tekle, charging Meta with promoting harmful content from November 2020 to November 2022.

One plaintiff, Abrham Meareg, alleges his father Meareg Amare Abrha, an academic at Bahir Dar University, was killed outside his home in 2021 following threatening posts on Facebook that included details about where he lived and false allegations of corruption and support for the Tigrayan People's Liberation Front. Fisseha Tekle, a former Amnesty International researcher, states he faced hateful posts and activity on Facebook for his human rights work in Ethiopia.

Reported impact

The plaintiffs allege that Facebook's recommendation algorithms amplified violent content during the Tigray war. They charge that Meta's algorithm recommends content amounting to propaganda for war, incitement to violence, and advocacy to Facebook users in Kenya, and that Meta grants preferential treatment to users in other countries compared to Facebook users in Africa, stating "the darker the content, the higher the likelihood it will be prioritized."

Index analysis

The court rejected Meta's argument that local courts lacked authority to hear the case in a country where the company is not registered. Kenya's High Court emphasized the importance of addressing such global matters in local courts, with the Katiba Institute executive director stating that the court recognized homegrown issues must be addressed directly in Kenya's courts.

Governance controls

Meta has previously stated it invested heavily in content moderation and has removed hateful content from the platform. However, the plaintiffs are demanding that Meta establish a restitution fund for victims of hate and violence and make changes to Facebook's algorithms to prevent the amplification of harmful content.

Classification

Category
Harmful and abusive content
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Ethiopia
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Physical death, Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
General public, Civil society
Failure modes
Content moderation failure
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Facebook recommendation algorithm

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

the Guardian
Meta faces Β£1.8bn lawsuit over claims it inflamed violence in Ethiopia
3 April 2025
Reuters
Meta can be sued in Kenya over posts related to Ethiopia violence, court rules
4 April 2025
AmnistΓ­a Internacional
Kenya: Meta can be sued in Kenya for role in Ethiopia conflict
3 April 2025
Profit by Pakistan Today
Kenya court allows lawsuit against Meta over hate speech - Profit by Pakistan Today
4 April 2025
middleeastmonitor.com
Kenya Court Rules Meta Can Be Sued Over Content in Ethiopia Violence