Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-47981
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Jury finds Apple Watch infringes Masimo blood oxygen patents

A California jury determined that Apple Watch blood oxygen monitoring features infringe patents owned by medical device company Masimo and ordered Apple to pay $634 million in damages. Apple states it will appeal, arguing the relevant patents expired in 2022 and its technology was independently developed.

14 November 2025 Β· Apple Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
14 November 2025
AII-1001-479812 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United States
Source
Yahoo News
Date
14 November 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A California jury on November 14 found that Apple Watch infringes patents held by medical device company Masimo related to blood oxygen saturation measurement technology using light transmission through skin. The jury determined that Apple Watch's workout mode and heart rate notification features violated Masimo's patents.

Masimo has alleged that Apple recruited its employees and used the company's technology in Apple Watch Series 6 and later models beginning in 2020. Apple contends that the patents expired in 2022 and that its health sensors were independently developed by Apple engineers.

Reported impact

The jury awarded Masimo $634 million in damages. Apple stated it disagrees with the verdict and plans to appeal.

Index analysis

The U.S. International Trade Commission previously issued an import ban on Apple Watch models with blood oxygen detection due to the patent dispute. Apple removed the blood oxygen feature from Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sold in the United States.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Healthcare, drugs and biotechnology
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property
Harmed
Business
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Apple Watch blood oxygen monitoring

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Yahoo News
Apple ι ˆε‘ Masimo θ³ ε„Ÿ 6.34 ε„„ηΎŽε…ƒοΌApple Watch θ‘€ζ°§εŠŸθƒ½ε†ζƒΉηˆ­θ­°
17 November 2025
Yahoo News (Taiwan)
θ˜‹ζžœι ˆε‘ Masimo θ³ ε„Ÿ 6.34 ε„„ηΎŽε…ƒοΌApple Watch θ‘€ζ°§εŠŸθƒ½ε†ζƒΉηˆ­θ­°
17 November 2025
May 2026Journalists and narrators sue tech giants for using voiceprints to train AIAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationnews.bloomberglaw.comCourt House News ServiceBiometric Update+4Apr 2026YouTubers sue Apple for scraping videos to train AI modelsAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationengadgetNotebookcheckMar 2026Chicken Soup for the Soul sues Apple, Google, Meta and others over AI trainingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationReuters9to5MacMacDailyNewsOct 2025Apple sued for using copyrighted books to train Apple IntelligenceAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationnews.bloomberglaw.comnews.cnfol.comeconomictimes.indiatimes.comSep 2025Apple sued by authors over alleged AI training with copyrighted booksAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationkalteng.antaranews.comototekno.harianjogja.com