Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-03821
Under investigationA regulator, court or police has opened a formal inquiry and reached no finding yet.

Judge Allows Voice Actors' Lawsuit Over AI Voice Cloning to Proceed

A federal judge in New York allowed a lawsuit by voice-over artists Paul Skye Lehrman and Linnea Sage against AI startup Lovo to proceed. The artists allege Lovo used their voices without permission to create AI-generated voice clones that were sold commercially, claiming they had been misled about the intended use of their voice recordings.

12 July 2025 Β· Lovo Inc. Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
12 July 2025
AII-1002-038212 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United States
Source
BBC
Date
12 July 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Voice-over artists Paul Skye Lehrman and Linnea Sage filed a proposed class action lawsuit against Lovo Inc. in 2024 after discovering AI-generated clones of their voices were being sold via Lovo's text-to-speech platform Genny under the names "Kyle Snow" and "Sally Coleman".

The artists were separately approached through the freelance marketplace Fiverr by anonymous clients who claimed to represent Lovo and offered them payment for voice-over work. Lehrman was told his voice would be used only for a "research project" and paid $1,200; Sage was told her voice would be used for "test scripts for radio ads" and paid $800. Both were assured their voices would not be disclosed externally and would only be consumed internally.

Reported impact

The artists discovered their voices were being used in a fundraising video for Lovo's platform and in an advertisement on the company's YouTube page. Lovo eventually removed the voices, claiming they were "not popular".

Index analysis

US District Judge J. Paul Oetken dismissed the artists' claims that their voices were subject to federal copyright and trademark protections, but allowed revised copyright claims alleging improper use of their voices in AI training data to proceed, along with claims of breach of contract and deceptive business practices under New York law.

Governance controls

Lovo had moved for the case to be dismissed entirely, arguing the plaintiffs failed to state an "actionable claim", but the judge permitted the case to move forward in US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Economic or property
Harmed
Workers
Failure modes
Voice clone, Training data misuse
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Genny

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

BBC
Federal judge says voiceover artists AI lawsuit can move forward
12 July 2025
Silicon UK
Federal Judge Gives Green Light To Voice Actor AI Lawsuit | Silicon
15 July 2025