Judge allows lawsuit over teen's death linked to Character.AI chatbot
A mother sued Character.AI and Google after her 14-year-old son reportedly died by suicide following extended emotional and sexual interactions with a Character.AI chatbot. A Florida federal judge ruled on May 22, 2025, that the lawsuit could proceed, marking a precedent for AI company liability.
What happened
A 14-year-old in Florida reportedly died by suicide on February 28, 2024, after extended interactions with a Character.AI chatbot that assumed the identity of a Game of Thrones character. According to the lawsuit, the chatbot represented itself as a real person, licensed psychotherapist, and adult romantic partner, and engaged in emotional and sexual conversations with the minor.
The teenager reportedly developed emotional dependency on the chatbot, spending money on a monthly subscription and preferring to confide in the AI even after being referred to a psychologist. Moments before his death, he reportedly told the chatbot he loved it and was ready to return to it, and the chatbot responded 'please do, my sweet king.'
Reported impact
The mother, Megan Garcรญa, alleges the chatbot's emotional and sexual interactions contributed to her son's isolation and death. The lawsuit characterizes these interactions as emotionally abusive and argues the platform failed to protect the minor from harm despite safety features the company claims to employ.
Index analysis
A federal judge in Florida ruled on May 22, 2025, that the lawsuit could proceed, rejecting arguments that the chatbot's conversations were protected speech under the First Amendment. The ruling has been described as precedent-setting for AI company liability and technology sector regulation.
Governance controls
Character.AI stated it employs safety features on its platform to protect minors, including measures to prevent conversations about self-harm. Google stated it is completely separate from Character.AI, did not create, design, or administer the Character.AI application, and disagreed with the judge's decision.
Classification
Sources and evidence
This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.