Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-59377
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.

IndiaMART sues OpenAI for allegedly excluding its platform from ChatGPT search results

IndiaMART filed a lawsuit in India's Calcutta High Court alleging that ChatGPT deliberately and systematically excludes its platform from AI-generated search results while displaying competitors like DHgate, Pinduoduo, and Taobao. The court found a prima facie case of selective discrimination without logical justification, noting the exclusion causes commercial injury and loss of goodwill to the marketplace.

2025 Β· OpenAI Β· Discrimination and fairness
2025
AII-1002-59377View source β†—
Quick facts
Category
Discrimination and fairness
Source
indianexpress.com
Date
2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

IndiaMART filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in the Calcutta High Court, alleging that ChatGPT 'specifically and consciously' excluded its website and listings from AI-generated search results while displaying competitor platforms including DHgate, Pinduoduo, Shopee, and Taobao.

On December 24, 2025, Justice Ravi Krishan Kapur observed that a strong prima facie case of 'selective discrimination' had been made, noting that the exclusion appeared to be 'without any logic.' The court acknowledged that such exclusion causes direct commercial injury, loss of goodwill, and trade libel through implied disparagement.

Reported impact

IndiaMART, one of India's largest B2B marketplaces with a presence in 40 countries and a 3,000-member workforce, faces significant economic harm as users increasingly use ChatGPT to discover products and suppliers.

Index analysis

IndiaMART alleged that OpenAI justified the exclusion based on reports from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), which had previously flagged IndiaMART regarding counterfeit concerns.

IndiaMART argued that OpenAI's application of these reports was arbitrary, as other international entities mentioned in the same USTR reports, such as Taobao, were not excluded from ChatGPT. The marketplace claimed it was never given notice or an opportunity to defend itself against the USTR findings before being 'de-indexed' by the AI.

Governance controls

The plea before Justice Ravi Krishna Kapur sought a declaration that the USTR reviews containing findings against IndiaMART were not binding on ChatGPT and could not exclude its website and listings from search results generated on AI engines.

Classification

Category
Discrimination and fairness
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Biased model
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
ChatGPT

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

indianexpress.com
IndiaMART sues OpenAI for allegedly excluding its platform from ChatGPT search results