Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-87241
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Immigration attorneys suspended for AI-generated briefs with fabricated case citations

Two Orange County immigration attorneys were suspended for six months and fined $2,500 each after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found they used generative AI to prepare court briefs containing fabricated case citations and misrepresentations. The attorneys initially denied that AI errors caused the inaccuracies, claiming they were typographical mistakes, but the court determined they acted with knowledge or recklessness in making false statements.

3 June 2026 Β· Sethi Law Group Β· Reliability and hallucination
3 June 2026
AII-1000-872415 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
United States
Source
Los Angeles Times
Date
3 June 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Orange County immigration attorneys Mike Singh Sethi and William Rounds of Sethi Law Group used generative AI to write court briefs that included multiple nonexistent cases, misattributed quotations, and gross misrepresentations of real cases.

When the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals discovered the errors, the attorneys initially claimed they were innocent typographical mistakes and repeatedly denied that generative AI might have produced them. The court found that the attorneys knowingly or recklessly made false statements.

Reported impact

Despite the fabricated content in the briefs, the court's November ruling in favor of the attorneys' clients, which halted the deportation of three family members from India, was not altered by the disciplinary proceedings.

Index analysis

The court emphasized that the discipline was issued not simply for the use of AI, but specifically for filing briefs containing fabrications and inaccuracies and for lacking candor in disclosing that these errors resulted from AI hallucinations.

The court warned other attorneys to be aware of the risks of overreliance on generative AI and to read everything carefully, stating that procedural and ethical rules apply with equal force regardless of how legal papers are prepared or what legal technology is used.

Governance controls

Sethi and Rounds were each fined $2,500 and suspended from practicing in the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for six months.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Reputational, Economic or property
Failure modes
Hallucination, Fabricated citation
Consequences
Litigation, Fine or settlement
AI systems
Generative AI
Regulations
FCRA (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Los Angeles Times
O.C. immigration attorneys suspended for filing briefs filled with AI-hallucinated errors
4 June 2026
news.bloomberglaw.com
Ninth Circuit Warns of AI Hallucinated Briefs in Sanctions Order
3 June 2026
San Francisco Chronicle
Sloppy AI use gets two California lawyers suspended for six months, fined
3 June 2026
ABA Journal - Law News Now
Attorneys' lack of candor over AI errors leads to stricter sanctions
4 June 2026
ArcaMax
Orange County immigration attorneys suspended for filing briefs filled with AI-hallucinated errors
4 June 2026