Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-47283
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

German court rules OpenAI's ChatGPT infringed song lyrics copyright

A Munich court ruled that OpenAI violated German copyright law by using song lyrics to train ChatGPT and allowing the chatbot to reproduce them without authorization or payment. The court ordered OpenAI to compensate GEMA, a music rights organization, for damages including unpaid royalties. OpenAI said it would appeal the decision.

11 November 2025 · OpenAI · Intellectual property and appropriation
11 November 2025
AII-1001-472834 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
Germany
Source
Reuters
Date
11 November 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

On November 11, 2025, a Munich court ruled that OpenAI infringed copyright by using song lyrics to train ChatGPT and reproducing them in the chatbot's outputs without authorization.

The case was brought by GEMA, Germany's largest music rights management society, representing around 100,000 music industry professionals. GEMA alleged that OpenAI used lyrics from nine German songs to train its language models and that ChatGPT reproduced these lyrics when users requested them, without licenses or compensation to creators.

Reported impact

The court found that both the memorization of lyrics in the training data and their reproduction in ChatGPT responses constituted copyright infringement. The tribunal ordered OpenAI to indemnify GEMA for all damages, including unpaid royalties and court costs, potentially amounting to several hundred thousand euros if the decision is upheld on appeal.

Index analysis

The court applied European case law establishing that indirect perception of a work constitutes reproduction sufficient for copyright infringement. The tribunal rejected OpenAI's defense that its models do not store individual data but instead learn patterns from training sets, ruling that users did not cause the copyright violation but rather OpenAI made the song lyrics publicly accessible through ChatGPT without authorization.

Governance controls

OpenAI announced it would appeal the decision and stated that it respects the rights of creators and content holders, claiming to conduct constructive discussions with organizations worldwide. A company spokesperson noted the decision concerned only a limited set of lyrics and did not affect millions of users in Germany.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Germany
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property
Failure modes
Training data misuse
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
ChatGPT
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Reuters
OpenAI may not use lyrics without license, German court rules
11 November 2025
Yahoo!
Primera victoria judicial de la industria musical alemana contra OpenAI - Yahoo Noticias
11 November 2025
Yahoo actualités
OpenAI a enfreint les droits d'auteurs de chansons, estime la justice allemande - Yahoo Actualités France
11 November 2025
Yahoo! Finance
ChatGPT violated copyright laws, German court rules
11 November 2025
Oct 2026Carlsen Verlag sues OpenAI for copyright infringement of "Das NEINhorn"AllegedIntellectual property and appropriationSpiegel OnlineRP OnlineBörsenblatt+5Oct 2026Argentine media group Perfil sues OpenAI and Microsoft over unauthorized content useAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationPerfilClarinSep 2026Mathematician Accuses OpenAI of Using Unpublished Research in Model TrainingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationThe VergeCybernewsQuartz+2Sep 2026OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra shows academic integrity concerns in mathematics researchAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationĐọc báo tin tức, tin mới Ngày nay OnlineVietnamPlusAug 2026AI companies buy and destroy rare books for model trainingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationThe Wall Street JournalOman Observer