Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-47067
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

German court rules ChatGPT violated copyright law by reproducing lyrics

A German court ruled that OpenAI's ChatGPT violated copyright law by memorising and reproducing protected German song lyrics in response to simple prompts, without proper licensing. The court found OpenAI liable for damages and ordered injunctive relief, marking what GEMA described as a landmark AI copyright ruling in Europe.

11 November 2025 · OpenAI · Intellectual property and appropriation
11 November 2025
AII-1001-470672 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
Germany
Source
osborneclarke.com
Date
11 November 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

The Munich I Regional Court ruled on 11 November 2025 that OpenAI's ChatGPT violated German copyright law by reproducing protected lyrics from nine well-known German songs including Herbert Grönemeyer's 'Männer' and Helene Fischer's 'Atemlos Durch die Nacht'.

The court found that ChatGPT had memorised copyright-protected texts by encoding them in model parameters, and that when the model output essential and original elements of these texts in response to simple prompts, this constituted further reproduction under copyright law.

Reported impact

The court granted injunctive relief and information claims, and found OpenAI liable for damages, with the quantum yet to be determined.

GEMA said it hopes to negotiate with OpenAI on how copyright holders could be compensated.

Index analysis

The court ruled that memorisation of protected texts within the model parameters constituted reproduction under Section 16 of the German Copyright Act and Article 2 of the InfoSoc Directive, rejecting OpenAI's argument that the model only learned statistical patterns.

The court determined that providing outputs to users further constituted making the work available to the public, and that the text and data mining exception did not apply in this case.

Governance controls

The judgment is not yet final.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
Germany
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Hallucination
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
ChatGPT
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

osborneclarke.com
German court rules ChatGPT violated copyright law by reproducing lyrics
uniladtech.com
German court rules ChatGPT violated copyright law by reproducing lyrics
Oct 2026Carlsen Verlag sues OpenAI for copyright infringement of "Das NEINhorn"AllegedIntellectual property and appropriationSpiegel OnlineRP OnlineBörsenblatt+5Oct 2026Argentine media group Perfil sues OpenAI and Microsoft over unauthorized content useAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationPerfilClarinSep 2026Mathematician Accuses OpenAI of Using Unpublished Research in Model TrainingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationThe VergeCybernewsQuartz+2Sep 2026OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra shows academic integrity concerns in mathematics researchAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationĐọc báo tin tức, tin mới Ngày nay OnlineVietnamPlusAug 2026AI companies buy and destroy rare books for model trainingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationThe Wall Street JournalOman Observer