Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-74859
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.

Flock surveillance cameras misused to stalk individuals across US cities

Flock's automated license plate readers, deployed across 80,000 US locations, have allegedly been misused by police officers to track romantic interests and exes. The system's architecture and default sharing agreements also raise concerns about privacy violations and unauthorized access to surveillance data.

1 May 2026 Β· Flock Β· Privacy and surveillance
1 May 2026
AII-1000-748593 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Privacy and surveillance
Country
United States
Source
404 Media
Date
1 May 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Flock operates more than 80,000 automated license plate readers across the US that capture vehicle location data. An ACLU investigation found that Flock's default agreement with police departments allowed the company to share license plate data with federal and local agencies for 'investigative purposes'.

The Institute for Justice analyzed media reports and found at least 14 cases where police officers allegedly accessed Flock ALPR data to track romantic interests, including current partners, exes, and strangers. Nearly all the officers involved were criminally charged and lost their jobs.

Reported impact

Residents across multiple US cities face surveillance of their movements and creation of AI-generated profiles without their consent. Flock cameras are installed along roadways, in parks, playgrounds, schools, parking lots, and libraries.

Flock employees have allegedly accessed camera feeds for purposes beyond law enforcement. A Georgia resident reported that a Flock employee accessed cameras at a children's gymnastics center, and people have reportedly purchased Flock login credentials online to gain unauthorized access to camera feeds.

Index analysis

The system enables large-scale tracking of vehicle movements across the nation through a network of cameras feeding data into AI databases that build citizen profiles. The architecture allows data sharing with federal and local agencies, creating risk of misuse by individual officers.

Multiple security vulnerabilities have been documented, including compromised employee access and the ability for unauthorized parties to purchase credentials and access live camera feeds from schools, libraries, and private facilities.

Governance controls

Some cities have begun removing Flock cameras in response to privacy concerns. Police departments have been shown to lack adequate internal controls to prevent officers from misusing the surveillance data for personal purposes.

Classification

Category
Privacy and surveillance
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
General public
AI systems
Flock automated license plate readers, Flock AI database

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

404 Media
City Learns Flock Accessed Cameras in Children's Gymnastics Room as a Sales Pitch Demo, Renews Contract Anyway
1 May 2026
The Guardian
Police are using surveillance tech to stalk love interests. Dystopia, here we come | Arwa Mahdawi
2 May 2026
96.5 KVKI
Surveillance Cameras Raise Privacy Concerns Across Shreveport Neighborhoods
4 May 2026