Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-12071
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Flock Safety halts federal data sharing over license plate reader privacy violations

Flock Safety paused pilot programs with U.S. Department of Homeland Security agencies after Illinois found that Customs and Border Protection accessed state license plate data in possible violation of a 2023 state law restricting such sharing for immigration-related investigations. The company's CEO acknowledged unclear parameters and inadequate permission controls.

25 August 2025 Β· Flock Β· Privacy and surveillance
25 August 2025
AII-1002-12071

What happened

Flock Safety, which operates automated license plate reading cameras in more than 4,000 U.S. communities, paused pilot programs with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Customs and Border Protection and Homeland Security Investigations after concerns emerged about data access.

An Illinois audit found that Customs and Border Protection had accessed license plate data from Illinois in possible violation of a 2023 state law that bars sharing such data with agencies investigating out-of-state abortions or undocumented immigrants. CEO Garrett Langley acknowledged that the company had communicated poorly and failed to create distinct permissions and protocols to ensure local compliance with state law for federal users.

Reported impact

Two months prior, Mount Prospect Police in the Chicago suburb had shared license plate data with a Texas sheriff seeking information about a woman who had undergone a self-administered abortion, raising concerns about unintended use of the system for purposes the company had not anticipated.

Index analysis

The license plate data itself is owned and controlled by local agencies in jurisdictions where cameras operate, not by Flock Safety, but the company provides the system through which federal inquiries are made.

Governance controls

Langley stated the company had initiated the pilot programs to combat human trafficking and fentanyl distribution but that parameters were unclear and the company was unaware of what search criteria the federal agencies actually employed.

Classification

Category
Privacy and surveillance
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights, Public interest
Harmed
Consumers, Government
Consequences
System suspension or termination
AI systems
Flock Safety License Plate Reader
Regulations
FCRA (cited)

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident